The Transformation of Liberalism, 1964 to 2001

By Powers, Thomas F. | The Public Interest, Fall 2001 | Go to article overview

The Transformation of Liberalism, 1964 to 2001

Powers, Thomas F., The Public Interest

We are engaged in a great adventure--as great as that of the last century, when our fathers marched to the western frontier. Our frontier today is of human beings, not of land.

Lyndon Johnson, Message on the Civil Rights Bill

TODAY, Americans take for granted, at the level of policy and principle, a commitment to fighting racism, sexism, and other forms of unjust discrimination. But the idea of anti-discrimination is in many ways a remarkable discovery in the history of modern democracy. The depth and seriousness of our commitment to this effort, despite its novel and even unprecedented character, is perhaps a large part of the reason we do not probe too deeply in thinking about it. But if we wish to see the full meaning of democratic citizenship in America today, we must become more fully conscious of this new pillar of our political order. Though a term of negative construction, anti-discrimination defines the positive meaning of equal citizenship today, and debates about it are at the heart of our civic and moral self-understanding. Above all, we must gain a more accurate view of the relation between anti-discrimination and America's liberal democratic tradition.

For very good reasons, Americans are devoted both to the liberal political framework of politics and to a policy of fighting discrimination. But in ways that we do not adequately appreciate, anti-discrimination transforms and at points even breaks with the liberal tradition. Thus American politics today orients itself by two competing moral and political polestars--anti-discrimination and liberalism--and this explains a great deal of the confusion surrounding our political debate on a number of divisive issues.

Is it possible that one innovation in public policy--the commitment to overcoming discrimination in the private as well as the public sphere--could have had such a dramatic impact on the contours of American democratic life? Certainly, the standard interpretation holds the fight against discrimination to be no more than the culmination of liberal principle, not a deviation from it. Most would agree with Daniel Patrick Moynihan's view that the civil rights revolution of the 1960s did nothing more than "at last redeem the full promise of the Declaration of Independence." The leading historian of the civil rights era, Hugh Davis Graham, maintains that the 1964 Civil Rights Act enshrines only "classic liberalism's core command against discrimination." In current debates, defenders of liberalism look for the cause of troubles not in the civil rights movement and its great political achievement but in seemingly alien intellectual developments or other social trends.

Clearly, something new and different is at work reshaping the basic logic of American politics. Despite its victory in the Cold War, the liberal tradition in America is under renewed attack in a culture war. Multiculturalists, Afrocentrists, radical feminists, postmodern advocates of a new "politics of difference," and a host of other activists (gay-positive, ethnic, linguistic, differently abled) have created a new political dynamic that has largely supplanted struggles that used to take place along class lines. In the current debate, even liberalism's highest principle--the commitment to free speech--is not immune to challenge.

To begin to see anti-discrimination more clearly, in all its power and importance, it is necessary to examine it from a number of different vantage points. First, the history of anti-discrimination's rise and ultimate victory makes clear the ways in which it was a correction to a blind-spot in the liberal framework, a remedy necessarily going beyond the confines of traditional liberalism. Second, and perhaps most important, anti-discrimination challenges the liberal understanding of the relationship between politics and morality. Against the liberal inclination, anti-discrimination makes the legislation of morality an open and explicit part of American politics, shaping a new ideal of democratic citizenship. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Transformation of Liberalism, 1964 to 2001


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.