I Wonder Whatever Became of Me?

By French, Tony | CineAction, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview

I Wonder Whatever Became of Me?


French, Tony, CineAction


A NOTE ON THE MARX BROTHERS

Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.

--Emma Lazarus, inscription on The Statue of Liberty

Ever since I started seeing the Marx Brothers' films in the 1930s (the later ones at first, alas!), I've been wondering what was so special about them and why they've lasted so magnificently, with an endurance equalled, in comedy, only by silent films such as those of Laurel & Hardy and--nowadays with a good many reservations--of Charlie Chaplin. Other comic talkies of the 1930s, mostly of the "screwball" variety, have also lasted well, but always, I think--as in the case of, say, The Awful Truth or Bringing Up Baby--because they were about something, usually intimate man/woman relationships. But the Marx Brothers' films can hardly be described as being obviously "about" anything at all. Of course, one might characterise The Cocoanuts (1929) and Animal Crackers (1930) as being "satires" on High Society just before and during the Wall Street Crash: but no-one could reasonably claim that Cunard or The Mob would have been justified in suing the makers of Monkey Business (1931) for misrepresenting life on passeng er liners and the true nature of gangsters, or that Horse Feathers (1932) gives us the low-down on the American system of Tertiary education, which was doubtless, like most such systems, beyond satire anyway. Many writers, including the admirable Joe Adamson (Groucho, Harpo, Chico and Sometimes Zeppo, London 1974) discuss Duck Soup (1933) as being direct political satire--possibly (but none too probably) meaning that, in the arraignment of Chico for espionage, it anticipates Hitler's Reichstag Fire trial by several months and Stalin's Treason Trials by four years: a truly prophetic achievement... But, sarcasm apart, I'm still, seventy-two years after their first film was released, wondering why the Marx Brothers' movies endure. Aren't they pretty meaningless, apart from mere jokes like "You're heading for a breakdown--why don't you pull yourself to pieces?"? Can pointless things be amusing (if at all) more than evanescently? What, really, are the Marx Brothers' films about?

First, to make some basic distinctions, which I think are generally accepted these days: the films which the Marxes made after they went over to MGM in 1935 (and after Zeppo left the act) show the new studio's complete misunderstanding of their art, an incomprehension which was made acceptable, in the first two at least, by the glossy genius of Irving Thalberg. Thalberg, having supervised A Night at the Opera (1935), died during the making of A Day at the Races (1937), and thereafter the Marx Brothers' films went into a steep decline, though they trickled on for another decade (one must expunge Room Service and Love Happy from one's mind. Apart from the general tiredness of the humour, the glitzy "production numbers" and the facile New Deal optimism, the MGM films look all wrong: they are so expertly-photographed (in one sense) that they give one the impression of taking place in the real world, or at least MGM's bryicreemed idea of it, whereas the Paramount films float the freer from mundane reality by virt ue of their very crudity, and Groucho's greasepaint moustache is entirely in keeping with the unreality of just about everything else. The MGM Brothers' personae have also changed fundamentally: they are now trying to help young lovers instead of sedulously disembowelling the whole idea of conventional bourgeois "love." There are plenty of hilarious sequences (five per film was Dr Thalberg's prescription), but for the most part they are merely funny. There is perhaps a sense in which, in viewers minds, the earlier films have been assimilated to, even absorbed by, the later. In my view the authentic Marx canon comprises only the five films made for Paramount between 1929 and 1933, all of which I've already mentioned. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

I Wonder Whatever Became of Me?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.