Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons

By Zaslavsky, Alan M.; Zaborski, Lawrence B. et al. | Health Care Financing Review, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview

Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons


Zaslavsky, Alan M., Zaborski, Lawrence B., Ding, Lin, Shaul, James A., Cioffi, Matthew J., Cleary, Paul D., Health Care Financing Review


INTRODUCTION

In 1995, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (then called the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research) initiated a cooperative agreement with RAND, Harvard, and Research Triangle Institute to conduct the CAHPS[R] study. The goals of the CAHPS[R] project included developing a standardized survey that could be used to assess the experience of consumers in different types of insurance arrangements and health care plans (Weinberger, 1999). In 1997, HCFA funded the CAHPS[R] consortium to develop a version of CAHPS[R] suitable for assessment of the experiences of Medicare beneficiaries in managed care. HCFA now uses that survey to assess Medicare managed care plans annually.

Several methodological problems complicate the measurement and reporting of health care data, particularly when reports draw comparisons among health plans, as is the case in the MMC-CAHPS[R] project. Among the challenges is the need to adjust appropriately for patient characteristics such as patients' health and sociodemographic characteristics, which are not under the control of plans and which may affect CAHPS[R] scores.

There are at least two reasons why it might be desirable to adjust plan CAHPS[R] scores. First, there are certain processes that one would expect to vary according to the characteristics of patients. For example, one CAHPS[R] question is "... how much of a problem did you have finding or understanding the information ... from your health plan?" Although it is desirable to communicate clearly with all patients, it probably is harder to do so with patients who have less education than with other patients. Second, certain personal patient characteristics might influence the response to questions, even if the process of care is the same for all patients.

To develop a case-mix adjustment model for the MMC-CAHPS[R] data, we first reviewed published studies. Next, we analyzed five data sets from surveys of health maintenance organization (HMO) populations in different parts of the United States and identified potentially important case-mix variables (Cioffi et al., 1998). Finally, we analyzed MMC-CAHPS[R] data to evaluate alternative models. We analyzed data from the first MMC-CAHPS[R] survey, based on CAHPS[R] 1.0, and from the second and third surveys, based on CAHPS[R] 2.0 (Cleary et al., 2000).

PREVIOUS RESEARCH

Given that there are few published studies of factors affecting health plan ratings, we reviewed studies of hospital care, ambulatory medical services, and health plans. Patient characteristics that have been identified as correlates of patient reports about their health care include (1) patient sociodemographic characteristics, (2) overall perceived health status, (3) functional status, (4) diagnoses or conditions, (5) length of relationship with provider or health plan and prior use of services, (6) whether the survey was completed by a proxy, and (7) institutional status (Cleary and McNeil, 1988; Aharony and Strasser, 1993; Weiss, 1988; Hall et al., 1990; Cleary et al., 1992; Zapka et al., 1995; Kane, Maciejewski, and Finch, 1997; Kippen, Strasser, and Joshi, 1997; Lee and Kasper, 1998).

Better self-reported health is consistently associated with higher ratings of health care services by consumers and patients (Cleary and McNeil, 1988; Aharony and Strasser, 1993; Marshall, Hays, and Mazel, 1996; Hall, Milburn, and Epstein, 1993; Roberts, Pascoe, and Attkisson, 1983; Hall et al., 1998). Current general health status tends to be the strongest predictor of patient or consumer satisfaction with health care services (Hall et al., 1990; Cleary et al., 1992; Zapka et al., 1995; Kane, Maciejewski, and Finch, 1997; Kippen, Strasser, and Joshi, 1997; Lee and Kasper, 1998). Perceived improvement in health also has a strong positive association with health care ratings (Kane, Maciejewski, and Finch, 1997; Kippen, Strasser, and Joshi, 1997).

The few studies that have investigated the relationship between satisfaction ratings and the presence of specific medical conditions have yielded inconsistent results (Hall et al. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Adjusting Performance Measures to Ensure Equitable Plan Comparisons
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.