Disproportionate Representation of Males in Special Education Services: Biology, Behavior, or Bias?

By Wehmeyer, Michael L.; Schwartz, Michelle | Education & Treatment of Children, February 2001 | Go to article overview

Disproportionate Representation of Males in Special Education Services: Biology, Behavior, or Bias?


Wehmeyer, Michael L., Schwartz, Michelle, Education & Treatment of Children


Abstract

It is a common circumstance that males receiving special education services outnumber females nearly two to one. The primary explanation for this has been that boys exhibit behavior patterns that are more likely to result in their referral to special education. A second reason for this situation may be biological differences in boys and girls. A third reason, one not widely discussed in the special education literature, relates to the impact of gender bias on referral and admission. To examine the latter, we conducted a comprehensive records review for all students admitted to special education across three school years to examine gender differences in referral, admission, and placement decisions while accounting for known biological and behavioral variables. Our findings support a hypothesis in the literature that males are not necessarily overrepresented in the special education population, but instead females who could benefit from special education services are underrepresented. One factor accounting for this underrepresentation is gender bias.

One of the most consistent characteristics of special education services in the past two decades has been the disproportionate number of males served. Many reports show that boys receiving special education services outnumber girls 2 to 1. For example, the 1992 Report to Congress on the implementation of IDEA reported that more than two-thirds (68.5%) of secondary age students served in special education were males, even though the percentage of school-age males without disabilities was 49.7%. Males were disproportionately represented in every disability category except for deaf-blindness. Learning and emotional disabilities were the most disproportionate categories, with males comprising 73.4% and 76.4% of each, respectively.

As the Report to Congress stated, the reasons for such a high number of males "is not straightforward" (p. 11). Three hypotheses have been forwarded to explain the preponderance of males in special education. First, overrepresentation is attributable to biological factors because boys are more vulnerable to some genetically-determined disorders and predisposed to have some specific learning disabilities. It is established that females have some biological advantages over males like fewer birth defects and more rapid maturation (Harmon, Stockton, & Contrucci, 1992). Second, because boys are more active and more likely to act out or misbehave in classroom settings, it has also been suggested that the overrepresentation of males is a function of behavior problems. Although genetic, biological or neuropsysiological differences may contribute to activity for boys, behavior problems based on early learning may also influence referral and placement decisions. Kedar-Voivodas (1983) noted that child rearing practice, sex role modeling, imitation, socialization, and a student's individual reaction to school can influence the repertoire of behavior that girls and boys perform in the classroom. Boys may learn early that adults are tolerant of their more active behavior while girls are encouraged to behave in more inhibited manners; passive, quiet, obedient, and pleasant (Wagner-b,1976). Third, researchers in gender equity propose that the disproportionate number of males is also due to influences of gender bias on the referral, classification, and placement process where bias refers to an inclination toward taking a position or reaching conclusions about a person based on their sex or gender. Kratovil and Bailey (1986) suggested that at the root of gender bias in identification for special education services is the gender-stereotyped societal expectations for girls and women, resulting in teachers expecting more from boys and setting high standards, while tolerating lower achievement in girls. Little research has been done t o examine gender bias or discrimination as a contributor to the preponderance of males receiving special education services (Anderson, 1997; Kratovil & Bailey, 1986; Karlen, 1985; Phipps, 1982). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Disproportionate Representation of Males in Special Education Services: Biology, Behavior, or Bias?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.