Views Unconsidered, Remedies Untried. (UPFRONT)

By Edwords, Fred | The Humanist, November-December 2001 | Go to article overview

Views Unconsidered, Remedies Untried. (UPFRONT)

Edwords, Fred, The Humanist

More than a month has passed since the horrifying events of September 11, 2001, took thousands of human lives: Americans as well as people from eighty other nations. Our media permitted us to live the catastrophe as it unfolded, witness the fear of the victims, share the sorrow of their loved ones, and admire the courage and determination of the rescuers. But our media also tried to do our thinking for us. From the outset they framed the discourse with war metaphors, giving titles like "America Under Attack" to their coverage and conjuring up images of Pearl Harbor.

Now we have arrived at another time: still close enough to feel and remember yet distant enough to reflect and ponder. In this new space it becomes our obligation as compassionate and rational beings to look deeper and wider and go beyond the immediate moment and the present war. It won't do to let the current mood of the country deter us from thoughtful analysis. Alternative viewpoints have barely been audible amid the din and now need a hearing.

And if this analysis and hearing leads us to conclude that the U.S. government has taken--at least in part--a wrongful path, we mustn't be cowed by the sort of intimidating bifurcation used by George W. Bush in his September 20 speech to Congress: "Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists." Sincere differences of opinion remain both possible and worthwhile in this important struggle against inhumanity.

So let us begin by analyzing the terrorists themselves. By their acts, they have made it easy to dehumanize them--indeed, to demonize them. Yet we know that, like all people, they were real human beings--as real as their victims--not the two-dimensional, almost motiveless villains depicted in media reports and political rhetoric. We can't simply write them off as nothing more than freedom-hating fanatics on a mindless mission of perversity. That's the stuff of comic books ... and propaganda films.

We'll never understand (and defeat) crimes against humanity if we don't understand the criminals. We need to know what induced them--and induces many other people around the world--to hate Americans so. We need to recognize that the terrorists most likely saw their acts as retaliation. There was a history behind all this--a precipitating cause leading to the effect.

In recent years, U.S. foreign policy has led directly and indirectly to significant civilian deaths in a number of countries. In return, over much the same period, the United States has suffered numerous terrorist attacks. Pointing this out doesn't constitute a defense of terrorism; it draws attention to a harsh reality known as blowback.

U.S. foreign policy has clearly evidenced all the swagger and self-absorption of a supremely powerful nation secure within its borders and confident in its military adventures. In this context, the United States' many acts of kindness have been viewed by its citizens as optional benevolences rather than vital necessities for participating in the global village. And the government's acts of foreign repression and support of repressive regimes have rarely been noticed by the citizenry at all--and downplayed or justified when they have. Putting it all together, we Americans think of ourselves as really nice people who don't take shit from anyone.

The attacks of September 11, however, undermined that self-confidence. Now we realize as never before that nobody is safe anywhere. No Great Wall, frontier legions, Maginot Line, or nuclear defense shield will protect us. A nuclear or chemical weapon can be hidden in the trunk of a car. A cloud of deadly microbes can be released into the air. Water supplies can be poisoned. And because we have more to lose than do those we would attack, and because our country offers more targets for terrorism than any "rogue nation" offers for bombs, our very wealth and power make us unequally vulnerable. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Views Unconsidered, Remedies Untried. (UPFRONT)


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.