Equal Justice under Siege: Coping with the Runaway Supreme Court; New Conservative Court Majority Threatens Civil Rights Gains, Sparking Uproar across the Nation

By Benson, Christopher | Ebony, December 1989 | Go to article overview

Equal Justice under Siege: Coping with the Runaway Supreme Court; New Conservative Court Majority Threatens Civil Rights Gains, Sparking Uproar across the Nation


Benson, Christopher, Ebony


EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER SIEGE

IT seemed like an open-and-shut case. After all, there are laws against the kind of abuse Brenda Patterson swore she had suffered during her 10 years as a teller and file clerk at the McLean Credit Union in WinstonSalem, N.C. In page after page of court transcripts, Ms. Patterson describes the sort of outrageous treatment Blacks surely thought they had overcome some time ago. She testified that, unlike White tellers and clerks, she was assigned menial tasks, including sweeping and dusting; she was subjected to racial slurs; she was openly criticized; she was repeatedly passed over for training and promotions; she was denied routine wage increases, and she was overburdened with work. Then, in 1982 she was laid off.

Enough, finally, was enough. Ms. Patterson sued the McLean Credit Union under the toughest federal law on the books--a long-dormant post-Civil War law that called for punitive damages for blatant racial discrimination. In a landmark 1976 case, the Supreme Court had opened the door for Blacks to use that law in similar cases. This year, however, the court decided to use Ms. Patterson's case to slam the door shut, leaving her and her legal claims out in the cold.

Brenda Patterson is not alone. More and more these days, civil rights laws--established, reaffirmed, accpted principles of justice and equality--are being challenged. The surprise is that the challengers are getting their day in court. The shock is that they are winning. "It seems as though there is a [Supreme Court] majority that is intent on closing the books on the 'Second Reconstruction,'" says Christopher Edley Jr., professor of law at Harvard University.

This has been a particularly harsh reality for Blacks, who have come to rely on a fair and compassionate Supreme Court for a generation of legal and social progress. The court's new agenda is what NAACP Executive Director Benjamin Hooks has described as the "legal lynching of Black America's hope ..."

The outcry is understandable. It was, after all, the Supreme Court that led the way 35 years ago--a decade ahead of the president and Congress--finally fulfilling the promise of full equality.

This year, it became clear that those days are over. "We have come full circle," Justice Thurgood Marshall told a group of federal judges in late summer. "We are back where we started."

In four major decisions, the court struck at the heart of Black economic empowerment. In City of Richmond v. Croson, the court took the side of a White contractor in striking down a local law that set aside 30 percent of public works contracts for minority-owned businesses; in Wards Cove Packing v. Atonio, the court changed the rules of the game in filing job-bias suits, placing the burden on employes to prove intentional discrimination instead of discriminatory effect; in Martin v. Wilks, the court allowed White Birmingham firefighters to bring a so-called "reverse discrimination" suit against a lower court-approved affirmative action plan after a Black became a lieutenant; and in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, the court barred the use of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 in fighting racial harassment on the job. These claims now are limited to the weaker remedies--back pay and reinstatement--of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

"There is no question that the Supreme Court term was a disaster for everyone who believes in equal opportunity, especially in the area of employment rights," charges Ralph Neas, executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights. "In fact, I would say that right now, the new five-person majority on the Supreme Court poses the gravest threat to civil rights in this country."

To make matters worse, the court seems to be going out of its way to broaden the impact of its rulings, answering questions that have not been raised.

"The court is reaching to reshape anti-discrimination law when all would agree that, if it is to be reshaped, that is the job of the Congress," notes Eleanor Holmes Norton, professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center, and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission chair under President Jimmy Carter. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Equal Justice under Siege: Coping with the Runaway Supreme Court; New Conservative Court Majority Threatens Civil Rights Gains, Sparking Uproar across the Nation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.