Frieze from Antiquity's Most Famous Structure Seen Anew

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), February 10, 2002 | Go to article overview

Frieze from Antiquity's Most Famous Structure Seen Anew

Byline: Kim J. Hartswick

The extraordinary marble sculptural frieze that adorned the Parthenon, one of the most famous buildings of antiquity, has been evaluated and studied for centuries, so it is all the more admirable that another attempt is made by Jenifer Neils, Ruth Coutler Heede Professor of Art History at Case Western Reserve University.

As is well known much of the frieze had been removed in 1801 by Thomas Bruce, seventh Earl of Elgin, and this (along with other marble elements from the Athenian Acropolis) was purchased by the British Museum in 1816, where it has been on public display (beginning in 1817) ever since. The frieze at the west of the building was not removed by Elgin's crew (it was too difficult because the roofing system above it was still preserved); however this too was finally taken off the building in 1993 because of progressive air pollution damage. Several other parts made their way to Paris and even to Palermo, and other pieces have been identified among the numerous fragments of sculptures from the Acropolis.

The general idea is clear - a procession (men on horseback and in chariots, grooms, marshals, sacrificial animals, tray and jug carriers, and other officials) beginning at the southwest corner of the building and moving in two more-or-less parallel lines to the middle of the east, where the two files meet with seated gods and goddesses and an intriguing ritual scene over the front door (the so-called peplos ceremony).

A procession is a good subject with which to decorate such a long continuous Ionic frieze, allowing for multiple figures that move with the viewer to the front door of the temple; however even this choice is unusual. Furthermore, the subject matter on the frieze of the Parthenon appears to be related to the religious rituals of the Panathenaia held every four years - local history writ large where mythological events were normally found. So, not only was the decision to incorporate an Ionic frieze into essentially a Doric structure unusual, but the continuous subject matter sculptured into it was equally noteworthy.

It is not surprising, therefore, with much of the scholarship of ancient art being based on comparative analysis, that the study of the "unique" Parthenon frieze has presented so many challenges. Among these concerns is whether the narrative is unified in space and time, but these attempts have perhaps failed because such unity was likely not of concern to the artists or viewers of antiquity.

What we perceive as inconsistencies or illogical aspects of the frieze were not only perhaps unimportant, but even unimaginable to an ancient viewer. We impose our modern perspectives and views onto an antiquity that cannot possibly live up to our expectations - hence our continual frustration with attempting to interpret the past. In fact, in another context the author states that, "It is anachronistic to impose our aerial vantage point on a population that saw the terrain from a very different perspective." I could not agree more.

The participants in the middle of the east frieze have been always a bone of contention because this scene, as the author writes, is "unique." Flanked by seated gods and goddesses, who literally turn their backs to the central narrative, the relationship between these two contiguous images (ritual and divine) is difficult to understand. Even more difficult to decipher is the so-called peplos scene because scholars are unable to come to a consensus on how to describe the physical remains.

Do the two girls at the left carry stools (I believe they do), and, if so, what is on top of them (pillows? folded cloth?)? Is the figure to the right a boy or girl (the author makes good arguments for a boy), and what is s/he doing with his/her neighbor, a bearded man? The cloth held by both is ready to be either folded or unfolded, and because the bearded man and a woman turn their backs to each other, should we view them not as a single event, but as two different ones? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Frieze from Antiquity's Most Famous Structure Seen Anew


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.