Statistics, Not Experts

By Meadow, William; Sunstein, Cass R. | Duke Law Journal, November 2001 | Go to article overview

Statistics, Not Experts


Meadow, William, Sunstein, Cass R., Duke Law Journal


INTRODUCTION

Legal proceedings, both judicial and administrative, frequently raise questions about what people, including experts, ordinarily do. (1) If a doctor is accused of negligence, for example, it is necessary to know about the customary practice of doctors. (2) Of course, negligence judgments depend, at least in part, on an assessment of ordinary practice. (3) But how is ordinary practice by professionals or others to be assessed?

In trials and on appeal, the basic answer is that the assessment comes via statements from expert witnesses who describe the ordinary practice. (4) There can be no doubt that experts know a great deal about topics on which ordinary people lack information. But experts, no less than other people, are subject to predictable biases. (5) Their judgments about risk are affected by the same heuristics and biases to which most people are subject, even if (and this is a disputed question) expertise tends to reduce the most serious errors. (6)

To correct the resulting problems, we offer a simple proposal: The legal system should rely, whenever it can and far more than it now does, on statistical data about doctors' performance rather than on the opinions of experts about doctors' performance. For the first time, it is becoming possible for law to rely on this evidence, for the simple reason that it is becoming increasingly available. If our argument is convincing in the medical context, it should apply in many other settings in which experts are asked to testify about negligence or deviations from ordinary practices. In many settings, the fallible opinions of isolated experts should be supplemented or replaced by statistical data. Those opinions should be seen as a kind of crude second-best, far inferior to the data that it approximates. A step toward reliance on such data would dramatically increase the sense and rationality of tort law, and perhaps other areas of law as well.

We are hopeful that the use of statistical data will simplify some of the central issues in litigation and reduce the role of strategic behavior in the litigation process. Battles between isolated experts will be easier to mediate when there is a large pool of evidence on which to draw. But our larger claim is that by using statistical data, the legal system will reach far more accurate results. If the law is seeking to determine the standard of care, it should not depend on fallible memories and recollections of local experiences. It should draw instead on more global evidence of the kind that is increasingly available for use in court and elsewhere. (7)

I. EXCESSIVE OPTIMISM ABOUT RISKS

A. In General

It is now well known that most normal people tend to be "risk optimists," in the particular sense that they believe themselves to be relatively insulated from risks that are faced by others who are similarly situated. (8) This is one of the most robust findings in cognitive psychology. For example, ninety percent of drivers believe that they are safer than most drivers and less likely to be involved in a serious accident. (9) Most people believe that they are distinctly unlikely to be subject to various risks, such as cancer, heart disease, and divorce. (10) In some important domains, people appear not only to believe themselves less likely than others to fall prey to certain risks, but also to underestimate the actual risk to which they are subject. (11) With respect to automobile accidents, people believe that the danger they face is less than it is as a matter of statistical fact. (12) Smokers appear to know the statistical risks of smoking, (13) but they believe that they are less likely than most smokers to fall victim to the various risks. (14) In one study, less than half of smokers surveyed believed that they had a higher-than-average risk of cancer or cardiovascular disease; indeed, most heavy smokers (at least forty cigarettes per day) believed that they were not at any increased risk. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Statistics, Not Experts
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.