Editorial

By Stoddart, Simon; Malone, Caroline | Antiquity, March 2002 | Go to article overview

Editorial


Stoddart, Simon, Malone, Caroline, Antiquity


Archaeology is at its best when tackling the major transitions of humanity: the emergence of culture, the development of agriculture and the formation of the state. Even in a theoretical age that is suspicious of any remnant of cultural evolutionism, we maintain that these transitions, and the categories we necessarily employ to define them, are still fundamental to our knowledge of humanity, and thus to archaeological research. The first transition defines the onset of humanity, the second provides the intensive food production on which the full impact of `culture' is developed, and the third represents a major re-working of political values and organization. In our current archaeological discussions of theory, we are inclined to forget the effectiveness and primary importance of archaeology in exploring each of these central issues. In the next three editorials of ANTIQUITY, we will investigate these major transitions with the assistance of invited colleagues. We invite readers to add their reactions.

We start with the final transition, variously defined in ways that are not co-terminous, as the city or the state. This is a threshold forgotten by some (Mithen 1996) and criticized over a number of years by others (Gledhill 1988; Kohl 1987). For still others it is dangerously associated with neo-evolutionary theory (Shanks & Tilley 1987). We examine here two traditions, the Mediterranean Old World (see also Book reviews section), where the concept of the city was perhaps first studied, but is subject to major critique, and the New World tradition where the state remains the accepted mode of analysis. Whither are these two streams of thought developing?

The recent conference organized by Barry Cunliffe (Institute of Archaeology, Oxford) and Robin Osborne (University of Cambridge) on Mediterranean Urbanisation 800-600 BC took place at the British Academy in London on 15 &16 November 2001, and provided an opportunity to assess the Mediterranean flow. This was deliberately an interdisciplinary conference attended by both archaeologists and ancient historians. The main thrust of the meeting was to reject or, at least, heavily criticize the city and state as entities, with particular suspicion directed towards the historical validity of founders of cities. In this latter respect the work of Carandini (already assessed in the pages of ANTIQUITY 73: 463-7) was reviewed critically. More generally, retrojection of later textual sources, in the past a frequent approach for the classical world, was also attacked. This is an important point because, although state formation and urbanization are a transition that often introduces the technology of written history, only archaeology can study the formative phases of the earliest examples. Archaeology is now available to provide a primary source of evidence into which the partial written sources can be fitted. This has not prevented historians attempting to employ textual models for earlier periods, and indeed some of this approach was present at the meeting.

If such concepts are rejected, what should be put in their place? One proposition was a vaguely defined idea of community. Another was the concept of identity, a theme popular in non-Mediterranean Europe but perhaps less developed for the archaeology of the Mediterranean. There was also a thrust that dynamism (and thus instability) was the underlying force, fuelled by the frequently addressed mechanism in the Mediterranean sea, that of trade and interaction. In summary, a pattern emerged of dynamic and changing political worlds in strong contact with other equally evolving political structures. To our mind, however, this is the product of a text-led analysis. In the Mediterranean world, there is still a relative lack of attention to infrastructure (production rather than consumption or usually deposition; agriculture rather than feasting; rural settlement rather than city life or more usually death). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Editorial
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.