Clinton's Brave New Business World: The Bush Administration Must Decide Whether to Continue Its Predecessor's Efforts. (Antitrust)

By Evans, David S. | Regulation, Fall 2001 | Go to article overview

Clinton's Brave New Business World: The Bush Administration Must Decide Whether to Continue Its Predecessor's Efforts. (Antitrust)


Evans, David S., Regulation


AN AGGRESSIVE EFFORT TO USE antitrust law to regulate the economy took place almost unnoticed in the last four years of the Clinton presidency. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) set implicit tests for anticompetitive behavior that effectively assumed many successful companies engaging in aggressive business practices were guilty of antitrust violations unless they proved themselves innocent. The federal agencies also took the position that business practices could be unlawful even when there was no specific evidence that the practices harmed consumers. That perspective shaped key antitrust cases in which the enforcement agencies sought restructuring and ongoing court-administered regulation of critical industries.

So far, the Clinton attempts to make antitrust a more powerful regulatory tool have fared poorly in litigation. The Supreme Court rejected the FTC's efforts to shift the burden of proof to the defendant in the 1999 California Dental Association decision. The FTC settled its case against Intel without getting the sweeping regulation over Intel's relationship with hardware makers that the FTC sought. A federal district court in Wichita dismissed the DOJ's antitrust case against American Airlines, noting, "The government's theory... represents a whole new mid-game spin on time-honored rules." The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals found that "most" of the trial court's findings that Microsoft committed antitrust violations did "not withstand appellate scrutiny." The appeals court rejected the trial judge's decision to break-up Microsoft, prompting the Justice Department to move away from pursuing some of the sweeping regulatory remedies that it had previously sought.

Clinton's Justice Department nevertheless has left a full antitrust plate for the incoming Bush administration. The new administration will have to weigh the virtues of policy continuity against the possibility that the courts will defer to a level of agency interventionism that runs counter to Bush's business philosophy.

HANDS-ON VS. HANDS-OFF ANTITRUST

The answers to just two questions separate students of antitrust into what I call the "hands-on" and "hands-off" schools:

* Apart from price-fixing and similar behavior, are anticompetitive practices common?

* Apart from price-fixing and other sorts of cartel behavior, can the courts distinguish anticompetitive from pro-competitive practices with sufficient accuracy, and design remedies with sufficient precision, to ensure that regulation will make consumers better off?

Answering "yes" to both questions, the federal enforcement agencies in the Clinton administration came down squarely on the interventionist "hands-on" side.

Prevalence of anticompetitive practices In the last quarter-century, game theorists have developed models that imply that a wide variety of business strategies can harm consumers. That is especially so in industries with few firms or with firms that make differentiated products -- a common real-world phenomenon. For example, firms may exclude rivals by tying complementary products, adopting strategies that raise their rivals' costs compared to their own, and investing in innovation that destroys rivals.

Theory also buttresses the view that the invisible hand may work poorly in "network" industries wherein the product becomes more valuable as more people use it. Academic work from the late 1980s and early 1990s shows that (a) network industries tend toward monopoly, (b) the resulting monopolies may use inferior technologies, and (c) inefficient monopolists may be very difficult to dislodge.

To counter those charges, members of the hands-off school argue that such anticompetitive outcomes occur, in theory, only under very specific and often unrealistic assumptions. Moreover, they believe that, in the real world, it rarely is possible to differentiate anticompetitive from pro-competitive strategic behavior. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Clinton's Brave New Business World: The Bush Administration Must Decide Whether to Continue Its Predecessor's Efforts. (Antitrust)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.