The Last Spaceship from Earth: In Space, Machines Have Proved More Useful Than Men. but We Should One Day Revive Human Spaceflight to Ensure the Survival of the Species. (Space)

By Rees, Martin | New Statesman (1996), May 20, 2002 | Go to article overview

The Last Spaceship from Earth: In Space, Machines Have Proved More Useful Than Men. but We Should One Day Revive Human Spaceflight to Ensure the Survival of the Species. (Space)


Rees, Martin, New Statesman (1996)


Back in the 1950s, space travel was a futuristic concept, familiar from comics and cornflakes packets. By 1969, Neil Armstrong's "one small step" on the moon had made it a reality. It seemed a high point in a decade blighted by the arms race and the Vietnam war. But soon it was all over: the last lunar landing was in 1972.

Nobody under 35 can remember the era when men walked on the moon. To young people today, it's a remote historical episode: they know the Americans landed men on the moon, just as they know the Egyptians built the pyramids; but the motivations seem almost as bizarre in the one case as in the other. The film Apollo 13 -- a "dramatised reconstruction", starring Tom Hanks, of the near-disaster that befell three astronauts on a voyage around the moon -- was for me (and I suspect for others of similar vintage who watched it) an evocative reminder of an episode we followed anxiously at the time. But to young people in the audience, the outdated gadgetry and the "right stuff" values seemed almost as antiquated as a traditional "western".

Many people expected that, by now, we would have a permanent lunar base, large orbiting "space habitats", or even an expedition to Mars. But none of these things has happened. The Apollo programme was a transient spin-off from the superpower rivalry of the cold-war era -- it wasn't a step towards any longer-term goal that could inspire sustained public support.

Manned spaceflight now seems a rather jaded spectator sport. We admired the Russian cosmonauts in the 1990s more for their fortitude and DIY skills than for anything else, as they coped with one malfunction after another in the decrepit Mir spacecraft. The trip of the ex-astronaut John Glenn in the space shuttle didn't recapture the excitement of his pioneering flight 36 years earlier; and most of us were merely bemused when another elderly American, Dennis Tito, paid the Russians $20m for a week's "tourism" in space.

The centrepiece of the US space programme is the International Space Station: when fully assembled, it will be the size of a football field, and will have cost more than its weight in gold. Even if it gets finished -- something that seems uncertain, given the immense and ever-rising costs, and prolonged delays -- the station will in itself be neither practical nor inspiring. Thirty years after men walked on the moon, it enables a new generation of astronauts to circle Earth, in more comfort than Mir could offer, but much more expensively. Several other nations, though not the UK, were persuaded to contribute to the space station. These commitments will foreclose international partnerships on a whole raft of alternative projects (for instance, satellites to monitor the environment) that could have offered greater political and social benefits.

In the US, the scientific community consistently opposed the space station. Opposition from, for instance, the American Physical Society ceased only when the project's political momentum rendered it unstoppable. For most of science (with the obvious exception of space medicine), it is as sub-optimal a base as an ocean liner would be for ground-based telescopes. Its best scientific use could be as an assembly-base for large and fragile equipment (for instance, gossamer thin mirrors for huge space telescopes), which could then be gently tugged into a more remote orbit.

By now, unmanned space technology has proved its worth. Satellites are routinely used for telecommunications, navigation, and for monitoring Earth's climate, oceans and terrain. Techniques would not have developed so fast without the impetus of the cold war, but civilian expenditure has now forged ahead of military. This trend could, however, be reversed if space gets militarised as a consequence of the proposed antimissile defence system.

Space technology has led to a crescendo of discovery in astronomy. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Last Spaceship from Earth: In Space, Machines Have Proved More Useful Than Men. but We Should One Day Revive Human Spaceflight to Ensure the Survival of the Species. (Space)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.