Swinging Seniors: Why Voters Will Decide 2002. (below the Beltway)

By Confessore, Nicholas | The American Prospect, June 17, 2002 | Go to article overview

Swinging Seniors: Why Voters Will Decide 2002. (below the Beltway)


Confessore, Nicholas, The American Prospect


ON ITS FACE, THE UNITED Seniors Association (USA) decision two weeks ago to launch a major advertising blitz in support of the House Republicans' prescription-drug proposal was not unusual. The pharmaceutical industry, which funds the USA, has a huge stake in how the prescription-drug debate plays out in Congress. Since the 1994 elections, the drug industry's campaign contributions have tilted Republican at about 72 percent. And even the ad campaign's $3 million price tag made sense: Steep, but a worthwhile investment to influence what could turn out to be a massive new government spending program.

What was odd was that the Republican plan in question doesn't really exist yet--because Republicans in the House are sharply divided over precisely what kind of plan to offer voters this fall. On the one side are Republican leaders, who circulated a draft plan in early May that would finance a modest Medicare-based prescription-drug benefit by cutting back Medicare payments to hospitals. On the other are several dozen rank-and-file Republicans who felt the benefit was either too small ($350 billion to the Democrats' $500 billion), too stingy (annual drug costs between $2,000 and $5,000 wouldn't be covered at all), or too shortsighted (because it would rob Peter's HMO to pay for Paul's arthritis pills).

By mid-May the dissidents were close to open revolution--which is why the drug industry, hoping to shore up support for the leadership's plan, had gotten involved in the first place. Republican Charlie Norwood of Georgia told reporters the bill had "serious problems." Iowa Representative Greg Ganske warned of small-town hospitals "getting close to bankruptcy." Pennsylvania's John E. Peterson predicted "devastating consequences" should the bill become law. But it's not just the consequences for hospitals that worry Norwood, Peterson, and Ganske. It's the consequences for themselves. Issues that seemed to have lost potency in the months after September 11--not just prescription drugs, but also Social Security and Medicare--have taken on a new urgency. Dozens of GOP incumbents are starting to feel vulnerable, as well they should: If 1992 was the Year of the Woman, 2002 is shaping up to be the Year of the Geezer.

IF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ARE A little like World War II--two vast armies squaring off from coast to coast--midterm elections are more like guerrilla wars. They are fought almost entirely by small numbers of highly trained, highly motivated foot soldiers: union workers and African Americans for the Democrats, religious conservatives and gun owners for the Republicans. Real combat is limited to a handful of competitive congressional districts and states with weak or retiring senators. And relatively few of those Americans eligible to vote actually will. The signs are already there: According to Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, women over age 60 have become the single most Democratic age group in the country, creating a massive 22-point gender gap among senior women between the two parties.

The result is that tiny groups of voters--and even tinier swings within those groups--can move an election one way or another. The last time around, in 1998, the Democrats surprised everybody, including themselves, by gaining five House seats. They won those seats in part through small but significant shifts in turnout among black voters--a campaign masterminded by Democratic campaign whiz Donna Brazile at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and energized by the Republican drive to impeach Bill Clinton. In the 25 targeted congressional districts, African-American turnout jumped from 5 percent to 10 percent. (The labor vote also increased significantly, to 23 percent in 1998 from a 13 percent share of the electorate during the dismal 1994 election.)

Sheer demographics, then, explain in part why seniors will be so pivotal in 2002: By some estimates they will constitute nearly one-third of voters who go to the polls in November--up from about 22 percent in 2000. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Swinging Seniors: Why Voters Will Decide 2002. (below the Beltway)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.