Taxman Offers Choice: Consolidate or Perish; the New Consolidation Rules Are Supposedly Optional for Australian Companies, but Those Who Don't Use Them Could Find Themselves at a Serious Tax Disadvantage. (Tax and Law Australia)

By Rigney, Harry | Journal of Banking and Financial Services, April 2002 | Go to article overview

Taxman Offers Choice: Consolidate or Perish; the New Consolidation Rules Are Supposedly Optional for Australian Companies, but Those Who Don't Use Them Could Find Themselves at a Serious Tax Disadvantage. (Tax and Law Australia)


Rigney, Harry, Journal of Banking and Financial Services


In keeping with the taxman's all-inclusive approach to consultation, the tax policy makers recently took it to the streets--quite literally--with a series of road shows to promote the Federal Government's new consolidation laws.

The push for street cred is what Minister for Revenue, and Assistant Treasurer, Senator Helen Coonan recently described as the "new inclusive way of the Australian Taxation Office to roll out complex tax legislation".

The consolidation measure, she added, has been "eagerly anticipated by big and small business". In reality there is not a lot of benefit for small business in consolidation, which generally views it as a necessary evil in order to retain access to carry-forward losses.

The consolidation measure has its genesis in the so-called Ralph review of business taxation (Chapter 15: Taxing entity groups on a consolidated basis).

The review, headed by prominent businessman John Ralph, aimed to tidy up aspects of consolidation in relation to franking credits and carry forward losses.

The review established six key principles:

> consolidation is optional, but if a group decides to consolidate, all its wholly owned Australian resident group entities must consolidate;

> consolidated groups of wholly owned Australian entities with a single common head entity will be treated as a single entity;

> the current grouping provisions will be repealed;

> losses and franking account balances of entities entering a consolidated group generally will be able to be brought into the consolidated group;

> losses and franking balances will remain with the consolidated group on an entity's exit; and

> the tax values of assets and liabilities on exit will be established according to the asset-based model.

Motivation for the consolidation measure, as a matter of policy, may be ascribed to two main drivers. First, there was a clear signal given to Ralph by business that this was a measure to simplify the tax compliance process.

In her announcement address, Senator Coonan gave an example of a group of 40 companies, in which the benefit from consolidation is that the head company provides the only tax return, rather than each company being required to provide a tax return.

Of course, to the extent that completing a tax return is simply the icing on the accounting cake, then there is little cost saving in this respect.

A related aspect of the simplification benefit is that assets and losses may be transferred within the group, free of some of the rules that apply at present.

The transfer of losses is a double-edged issue, however, in that if a group does not elect to be treated under the consolidation measures then it will lose the capacity to transfer losses.

The corollary of introduction of the new measure is that the existing grouping rules will terminate from 1 July 2002. When an entity has a substituted accounting period, the new measure commences with the first income year starting after 1 July 2002.

The other key driver for consolidation is the taxman's perceptions of revenue threats. The relevant perception is that revenue is at risk because the existing grouping provisions for wholly owned groups provide opportunities for tax avoidance through artificial arrangements.

Yet the measure is mooted to save business approximately $1 billion over three years. On being questioned as to the source of those savings, Senator Coonan, in releasing the draft legislation, appeared to suggest that it was a saving in compliance costs.

Not all the reception for the consolidation measure has been by way of unbridled enthusiasm. In its response to the draft legislation, the Taxation Institute of Australia was disappointed the Government ignored its suggestion of continuing with the current system in parallel with the new rules for an additional twelve months. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Taxman Offers Choice: Consolidate or Perish; the New Consolidation Rules Are Supposedly Optional for Australian Companies, but Those Who Don't Use Them Could Find Themselves at a Serious Tax Disadvantage. (Tax and Law Australia)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.