Research Administrators and Development Officers: Orchestrating from Organizational Discord to Harmony

By Streharsky, Charmaine Judy | Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, Winter 1989 | Go to article overview

Research Administrators and Development Officers: Orchestrating from Organizational Discord to Harmony


Streharsky, Charmaine Judy, Journal of the Society of Research Administrators


RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICERS: ORCHESTRATING FROM ORGANIZATIONAL DISCORD TO HARMONY

Background

There is a potential for conflict between the research administration/sponsored program administration office (grant/contract-seeking entity) and the development office (gift-seeking entity) within most institutions of higher education and many non-profit organizations such as hospitals. If one considers three basic sources of intergroup conflict (Sacks, 1979, p. 33), i.e. goal incompatibility, lack of sufficient information and resources to make decisions independently, and the unrealistic performance expectations of interacting groups, it seems that a research administration office and a development office are likely to experience conflict in any medium- to large-size institution. At very small institutions, however, the grants administrator often serves other roles, such as development officer and news service director. Alternatively, research administration becomes an ancillary task of a college development officer or institutional academic officer at the small institution (Walsh, 1986, p. 34). However, this arrangement is the exception rather than the rule. The more common case is that sponsored program administrators and development officers work in distinctly separate units reporting through different vice presidents.

Although it seems simple to have one group deal with grants and contracts generated mainly from governmental sources and the other with private gifts, we know this is no longer true. There is a great deal of overlap in the private foundation and corporate spheres. Black and white melts into a medium-gray haze. It is clear that both offices need to work together in an efficient and reliable fashion for the sake of the institution as well as the sponsors.

Both groups' activities often include one or more of the seven boundary spanning categories proposed by Robert H. Miles, i.e. representing the organization to outside elements, protecting against disruptive or harmful outside influences, scanning trends, gatekeeping by selectively transmitting information to key institutional decision-makers, transacting exchanges of resources between the organization and external elements, and linking/coordinating both inside and outside the organization (Harman & McClure, 1983, p. 36).

In Managing the Higher Education Enterprise (Karol & Ginsburg, 1980, p. 72), separate chapters are devoted to development activity and sponsored activity, with a glancing reference that private foundation sources of funding are frequently relegated to the research administration function because these sources are drawn upon most often to support faculty research. This issue was scarcely addressed in a cursory review of various texts dealing with higher education organization and administration. Perhaps this is because its importance is minimized when contrasted with other, more serious, organizational conflicts dealing with governance and accountability. It is, however, an issue with which growing numbers of us must deal daily on the front lines.

Typically, sponsored program administration officers are much more control-oriented than development officers. This is not surprising given the general nature of the work. Attainment of a certain funding level is not their ultimate goal, while some development officers may feel that is the case in their divisions. Sponsored program administration officers are often given broad responsibilities in compliance-related areas and deal with everything from misconduct in science to biohazards. On the other hand, development officers may have broad institutional advancement duties in public relations which go beyond fund-raising.

Need for Cooperation and Demarcation

Development officers are rarely as cognizant as research and program administrators of institutional obligations regarding animal care and use, human subject protection, patenting and licensing regulations, facility modifications required to accommodate equipment, etc. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Research Administrators and Development Officers: Orchestrating from Organizational Discord to Harmony
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.