Ethics Committees as Corporate and Public Policy Advocates

By Cohen, Cynthia B. | The Hastings Center Report, September-October 1990 | Go to article overview

Ethics Committees as Corporate and Public Policy Advocates


Cohen, Cynthia B., The Hastings Center Report


Ethics Committees As Corporate and Public Policy Advocates

New roles will open to ethics committees in the 1990s in the face of dramatic changes in the structure of the health care system and range of patient care choices. As vertically integrated corporations take over the for-profit sector, an ethos of profit maximization and value-blind competition will affect options available to patients in both the for-profit and non-profit sectors. Moreover, if current trends continue, local and federal governments will enact new laws and regulations restricting the kinds of care available not only to the poor, but to those better off, in attempts to decrease growth in their budgetary allocations to health care. The cost containment policies of corporate superstructures and government bodies will adversely constrain the health care choices of patients and create barriers against shared decisionmaking by patients and caregivers. Ethics committees, in response, will find themselves morally impelled to move into the corporate and public policy arenas to advocate a recovery of our fundamental vision of the connection between human dignity, individual need, and the common good.

Should ethics committees engage in public discussion of ethical issues affecting patient care? Is it wise for them to address directors of corporate conglomerates, visit congresspeople, submit briefs to courts on these issues? If so, should they speak out on positions taken at their home institutions or present their own?

Mature ethics committees will be increasingly called upon to engage in advocacy outside the walls of their institutions in the next decade if they are to fulfill their mission within those very walls. The institutions they serve are not just a collection of miscellaneous health care services, but agents of care and healing with a special trust, a fiduciary responsibility, that most other market-oriented institutions do not share. To meet this responsibility, health care institutions must give high priority to the interests of their patients.

As the interests of some patients are adversely affected by policies that lead to skimming and dumping, mandated care by protocol, and triage by wallet, ethics committees, the "conscience" of their institutions, will have to speak out. They cannot meet their charge of eliciting, developing, and upholding a value structure for their institutions if they remain silent about extra-institutional policies that work to the detriment of patients. Committees with experience at in-house education will be especially well geared to serve as advocates in the corporate and public forums, for they will have well-developed ideas, information, and arguments to provide to policy makers. (Of course, they will have an obligation to check with the in-house body to which they report about possible legal restrictions on their promotion of particular legislation.)

Ethics committees are already beginning to move outside their institutions as their members enter the halls of Congress to acquaint legislators with the Patient Self-Determination Act. They are venturing into courtrooms to provide advisory opinions about difficult patient care cases, meeting in regional networks to exchange methods for resolving common problems, and sitting at corporate boardroom tables to assist in health care planning, financing, and delivery.

Some will argue that this is a terrible mistake. Ethics committees should function as ethical tabula rasas, bringing no preconceptions or biases to their deliberations. Since their members often have different ethical convictions, none has a claim on the absolute truth. The role of these committees, on this view, is to facilitate the development of fair decision-making processes, not to espouse substantive positions. Committees cannot take a stance on policy matters without compromising their integrity as impartial adjudicators and should not become advocates for certain corporate and public policies. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ethics Committees as Corporate and Public Policy Advocates
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.