Novak Verdict Draws Fresh Focus on Juries Experts Debate Growth of Awards

By Tucker, Rich | The Florida Times Union, August 7, 2002 | Go to article overview

Novak Verdict Draws Fresh Focus on Juries Experts Debate Growth of Awards


Tucker, Rich, The Florida Times Union


Byline: Rich Tucker, Times-Union staff writer

When a Jacksonville judge last week rejected the $5.35 million malpractice verdict jurors awarded to former Jaguar Jeff Novak, medical defense attorneys called the case a frightening example of what happens when juries make decisions based on emotion.

They blame rash decision making for driving up malpractice awards nationwide, and they cite the judge's decision in Novak's case as an example of the legal system correcting itself.

But some legal experts wonder if the trend of growing malpractice awards is an unavoidable consequence of jurors being asked to play lawyer, doctor and judge.

"There's always been the concern that jurors, particularly when they're frustrated with the system, take matters in their own hands to produce what they see as a fair verdict," said Scott Makar, a Jacksonville lawyer who helps write the instructions judges read to juries to explain the law. "They look for a verdict that fits their own sense of fairness, rather than what the law calls for."

To prevent such jury vigilantism, courts have the jury instructions, which are a guidebook designed to explain to jurors how the law applies to the case they are to decide. Some believe those instructions often are as complex as the laws they are meant to simplify.

"There is no doubt that jury instructions need to be in more plain English," said Arthur Patterson, a national expert who has studied how jurors decide cases for more than 20 years. "If they can't understand the law easily, most of the time, jurors won't follow it."

Malpractice cases incorporate several complex elements of the law for jurors to tackle. A plaintiff must prove a doctor's care was below an acceptable industry standard. And beyond that, a plaintiff must prove that negligent care caused some particular damage or harm. That high standard leads to two out of three malpractice trials ending with a jury verdict against the plaintiff.

Still, Patterson said jurors in malpractice cases frequently lose sight of the fact that negligent care alone is not a reason to find for the plaintiff.

"What jurors tend to do is decide is, 'Did the doctor do something wrong?' " he said. "If they decide the answer to that question is 'Yes,' and since the award is not coming out of their own pocket, they are going to award what they feel is fair."

Juries have been awarding ever larger sums in medical malpractice cases in recent years. In 2000, the median award was $1 million compared to half that five years earlier, according to Jury Verdict Research, an independent firm that analyzes verdicts from juries nationwide.

Some plaintiff attorneys say jury awards are up because current cases that get to trial involve more egregious examples of negligent care than in past years. But many legal experts say jurors' views on what makes an appropriate award have been skewed.

"They see professional athletes making tens of millions, they see the lottery and they believe a million dollars is not a lot of money," Patterson said. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Novak Verdict Draws Fresh Focus on Juries Experts Debate Growth of Awards
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.