Vulnerable under God: Could Religious Colleges Be the Next Institutions under Legal Attack?

By Schaefer, Naomi | The American Enterprise, September 2002 | Go to article overview

Vulnerable under God: Could Religious Colleges Be the Next Institutions under Legal Attack?


Schaefer, Naomi, The American Enterprise


Education scholar Diane Ravitch reiterates in the New Republic what must be the best legal argument for school vouchers: "Why are children from impoverished families ineligible for tuition support if they attend St. Joseph's High School, but fully qualified to receive a Pell Grant from the federal government if they enroll in St. Joseph's College a few blocks away? Why is federal funding, and in some cases state funding, readily available to religious-sponsored institutions of higher education?" Ravitch argues that the time has come for primary and secondary school students to enjoy the same privileges as their university counterparts. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the Supreme Court's recent ruling that. Cleveland's school-voucher program was indeed Constitutional, the majority opinion, repeatedly citing Pell grants, recognized the power of this argument.

But the obvious, worrisome, yet little-acknowledged problem with this line of reasoning is that it can be turned on its head. Opponents of school-choice programs, frustrated in their defeat, might begin to wonder why federal and state funds are going to religious colleges and universities across the country, not only in the form of indirect support through financial aid, but also through direct grants for construction and research. Indeed, the inconsistencies among the rules regarding public support of religious organizations, from schools to soup kitchens, are glaring. And though this latest decision makes it seem as though the courts are swinging in favor of equal government treatment of religious and secular institutions, none, including religious colleges, is out of the woods yet.

The legal conflicts over federal support for religious higher education began in 1968, when a taxpayer filed a suit challenging the claim of four Catholic colleges in Connecticut to receive grants under the Higher Education Facilities Act for construction of campus buildings. The federal district court, in the resulting case of Tilton v. Richardson, ruled in favor of the defendants on the ground that the buildings would not be used for religious purposes. The plaintiff appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, which considered it alongside the parallel cases of Lemon v. Kurtzman and DiCenzo v. Robinson in 1971.

In Lemon, the court ruled that state aid for parochial elementary and secondary schools was un-Constitutional because it would have required "excessive entanglement" on the part of the government to ensure a strict separation between religious and secular education. In Tilton, however, the Court upheld the awarding of federal aid to the Catholic colleges. A plurality on the Court distinguished aid to religious colleges from aid to primary and secondary schools on two grounds. First, "college students are less impressionable" and not as susceptible to religious indoctrination. Second, "by their very nature, college and post-graduate courses tend to limit the opportunities for sectarian influence by virtue of their own internal disciplines." These factors helped the court rule that the colleges in question were not "pervasively sectarian" (a phrase that Ed Ericson, English professor at Calvin College, correctly notes "comes from a world of discourse alien to the religious colleges to which it is applied ... and applies a negative value judgment from the start").

Over the last 35 years, the first argument has held true (seven-year-olds are still rarely independent thinkers), but the validity of the second one has at least become more doubtful. In fact, the current trend in much of religious higher education is toward the "pervasively sectarian." At colleges ranging in denominational affiliation from Mormon to Jewish to evangelical Christian, many administrations are placing a new emphasis on the integration of faith and learning. Rather than restricting religious education to departments like theology and perhaps philosophy, religious colleges now believe it important for students to see the relevance of their faith commitments in each of their "secular" intellectual pursuits. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Vulnerable under God: Could Religious Colleges Be the Next Institutions under Legal Attack?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.