The Fog of Battle: Bush's Diplomatic Offensive Is Well Underway. but Talk Is Cheap, and War Is Not. Evaluating the Military Options

By Barry, John; Thomas, Evan | Newsweek, September 30, 2002 | Go to article overview

The Fog of Battle: Bush's Diplomatic Offensive Is Well Underway. but Talk Is Cheap, and War Is Not. Evaluating the Military Options


Barry, John, Thomas, Evan, Newsweek


Byline: John Barry and Evan Thomas

It was, in sheer scale, "the greatest cavalry charge in American history," wrote one military historian. The four-day, 250-mile sprint of the 24th Mechanized Division around the western flank of Saddam Hussein's Army in the 1991 gulf war was a dashing feat of arms, a show of American can-do spirit and ability. But as the U.S. military prepares to finish the job, possibly by driving all the way to Baghdad, it is worth considering the heavy lifting required to move a division of tanks and armored-personnel carriers that far, that fast. The 24th Mech had 1,600 armored vehicles, 3,500 wheeled vehicles and 90 helicopters. To keep the division's 18,000 soldiers rolling along required 395,000 gallons of fuel, 213,000 gallons of water and 2,400 tons of ammunition--each day. Before shoving off, the 24th Mech stockpiled 2.3 million gallons of fuel and 3 million tons of other supplies. Multiply those totals by four or five, and you have some idea of the bare minimum of logistics required by the Pentagon to fight a brief but winning war 8,000 miles away.

Diplomacy may head off war. Conceivably, Saddam will allow U.N. arms inspectors free rein to roam Iraq. But in the more likely event that the Iraqi strongman balks at the anywhere, any-time access demanded by the Bush administration, the U.S. military is preparing to change Saddam's regime by force of arms. While Saddam's forces are much weaker than they were a decade ago, when they folded before Operation Desert Storm in less than 100 hours, Saddam would be fighting for his life this time around. Driving Saddam out of power could be far bloodier than driving him out of Kuwait. According to knowledgeable sources, planning for the invasion of Iraq is not as far along as press reports generally assume. The Pentagon has reportedly presented President George W. Bush with detailed options for attacking Iraq, but the top brass is still wrestling with several key questions that must be answered before a quick and not-too-costly victory can be assured.

What bases--and what plan? Ideally, the Pentagon would like to be able to hit Saddam from all sides--from Jordan in the west, Turkey in the north, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia in the south and west. The Saudis, in particular, were helpful in the gulf war, providing U.S. warplanes with a score of air bases. But no Middle Eastern country is eager to be seen as a launching pad--or doormat--in an American invasion of an Arab nation. Saudi Arabia has barred the United States from using its bases or even flying overhead unless the United Nations passes a resolution authorizing the use of force against Iraq. If, as expected, the U.N. arms-inspection process drags out for months, Bush may decide that he cannot afford to wait. Yet if America goes it alone, the Saudis may not only deny their bases but lean on the smaller gulf states to stiff the Americans as well. Without sure knowledge of where forces can be positioned and poised to strike, the war planners at Central Command and in the Pentagon are laboring under tremendous stress.

The uncertainty has caused tension between the military and its civilian masters. According to one knowledgeable source, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has engaged in frustrating, circular discussions with his generals. In a scene that has repeated itself more than once, Rumsfeld, an impatient questioner, demands to see a plan of attack. The generals respond that they can't plan without knowing exactly what they are planning for and with what tools, i.e., what bases and what forces. Rumsfeld becomes vexed and insists on "out of the box" thinking. The generals look perplexed or exasperated and fall back on traditional notions of the American way of war, which is to overwhelm the enemy with superior firepower. Such a campaign takes a long wind-up and a massive attack, which prompts the basic questions--from where? with what forces?--all over again. Some Pentagon officials are already mocking the massive assault proposed by CENTCOM's Gen. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Fog of Battle: Bush's Diplomatic Offensive Is Well Underway. but Talk Is Cheap, and War Is Not. Evaluating the Military Options
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.