Establishing Formal Specialties within the Accounting Profession

By Holley, Charles L. | Akron Business and Economic Review, Summer 1990 | Go to article overview

Establishing Formal Specialties within the Accounting Profession


Holley, Charles L., Akron Business and Economic Review


Establishing Formal Specialties Within the Accounting Profession

In its 1985-86 Annual Report, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) [1, p. 213] stated, "recognizing the existence of de factor specialization among members and the desire of some to have a particular expertise recognized, Council authorized a program to accredit specialties. The Special Committee on Specialization ... will study areas of practice in which members, by meeting experience, examination, and educational requirements, can seek accreditation."

This formal creation of a special AICPA committee to pursue the accreditation of specialties is significant because this action recognizes the reality that specialization is very prevalent in the accounting profession. The special committee's report will not be available for some time; however, the primary question for resolution should be "How will the formal accreditation (certification) system for specialization of practitioners operate?" Specialization is a logical reaction to the reality within the accounting profession as changes occur in the environment. This paper summarizes the specialization issues, describes certain conditions that now especially favor recognition of specialists, presents certain advantages and disadvantages associated with accrediting specialties, and offers recommendations for implementing a specialization framework.

The accounting profession's traditional position has been that all CPAs are qualified and competent to provide comprehensive services commonly offered by public accounting firms. Consequently, it has not been considered necessary to formally create specialization classifications with supporting practice standards. However, during the 1970s, the AICPA did attempt several times to resolve the issue of formal recognition of specialization within the accounting profession. These unsuccessful efforts were undertaken by separate special committees established in 1970, 1973 and 1975. The rationale for creating these committees, together with their activities, recommendations, and reasons for their ultimate demise, has been described by Olson [3]. Two of these committees apparently had their efforts concerning specialization somewhat influenced and also diluted by the concurrent issue of whether associate memberships for non-CPAs should be allowed by the AICPA. The rationale for this issue was whether individuals working within CPA firms and having specialized knowledge should be permitted to gain membership in the AICPA even though they were not CPAs.

Moreover, during the 1970s, the AICPA's bylaws were being examined for a number of important issues regarding the scope of services provided, such as management advisory engagements and the legal implications of other provisions of the Code of Ethics. These special committees also functioned at a time when ethics interpretation 502.4 (Self Designation as Expert or Specialist) was in effect. This interpretation [2] stated, "Claiming to be an expert or specialist is prohibited because an AICPA program with methods for recognizing competence in specialized fields has not been developed and self designations would be likely to cause misunderstanding or deception. A member or a member's firm may indicate the services offered but may not state that the practice is limited to one or more types of service."

Traditionally, the AICPA Code of Ethics prohibited CPAs from promoting themselves as specialists, but the Code could not prohibit the actual trend toward emerging specialization. Ethics interpretation 502.4 was initially established to prevent self designation of a specialized proficiency since no certification structure was available to recognize specialists. The professional ethics committee in 1981 withdrew its restriction against members claiming specialist or expert status. This revocation of interpretation 502.4 represented a logical extension of the reversal in 1978 of the ethics prohibition against advertising. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Establishing Formal Specialties within the Accounting Profession
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.