Where Next? Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Argentina: Western Diplomats Warn That These and Many Other Countries Could Spawn Atrocities. Are Two Fronts Enough for Bush's War on Terrorism? (Cover Story)

By Kampfner, John; Mirodan, Seamus et al. | New Statesman (1996), October 21, 2002 | Go to article overview

Where Next? Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Argentina: Western Diplomats Warn That These and Many Other Countries Could Spawn Atrocities. Are Two Fronts Enough for Bush's War on Terrorism? (Cover Story)


Kampfner, John, Mirodan, Seamus, Parussini, Gabriele, New Statesman (1996)


You haven't heard of Takhir Yuldash. You may well do soon. The leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan operates from a secret location in Pakistan and has eluded US special forces hunting him. In May, he told villagers in the tribal region bordering Afghanistan: "Even if only one Muslim is left alive it will be a victory. We need to erase America from the face of the earth."

The bombing in Bali tells us that people like Yuldash matter. Nowhere in the world is now safe from the threat of terrorism, or impervious to the policies that may have given rise to it.

Shortly before the attack on the nightclub in Kuta, I talked to a senior British diplomat. We discussed Iraq, and then I asked him what other areas of the world he was concerned about. He gave me a compelling tour d'horizon of the next flashpoints. From Indonesia and the neighbouring Philippines to Yemen and Saudi Arabia, from central Asia to the Maghreb, from the failed states of Somalia and Sudan to Turkey, and the imploding economies of South America, you find ingredients for the next acts of terrorism.

These countries are only the start. Yet since his "axis of evil" speech, George W Bush has focused most attention on one state: Iraq. Despite the best efforts of his intelligence chiefs, he has failed to produce evidence that links Saddam with the destruction of the World Trade Center or with any subsequent attack.

While Bush and the ideologues around him prepare for war against a lone government, they have failed to see that it is nongovernmental terrorist cells that pose the biggest threat. Since 11 September last year, intelligence agencies believe, there have been more than a dozen acts of terrorism linked to al-Qaeda. Some have caught the headlines (usually the ones in which the casualties have included Britons and Americans). Others have not. They all lend credence to warnings in Whitehall that the White House is failing to combat the threat and has not begun to address the root causes. According to the British, the Americans are also way behind in intelligence gathering.

The first area of concern is Saudi Arabia, birthplace of 15 of the 19 original hijackers. The country represents a terrible dilemma for the Americans and British. Whatever the corruption and mismanagement of the royal family (average per capita income has fallen by nearly two-thirds over the past two decades), any transfer of power -- by democratic or other means -- would put even more fundamentalist Wahhabis in charge. Kuwait already seems out of control, with two shootings of American soldiers.

The Yemeni coast was the scene of the recent attack on a French oil tanker -- a mirror image of the attack on the USS Cole in October 2000. The Americans and British have to keep a very low profile in Yemen for fear of assassination or kidnap. In the early 1990s, with CIA help, Yemen became a haven for "Arab Afghans" -- Muslim volunteers from various countries who used it as a base against the Soviet-backed government in Kabul. Now there are said to be at least three guns per person in the country. Yemen is one of several "failed states", where weak or non-existent central government has left a perfect vacuum for networks such as al-Qaeda. Somalia and Sudan are two more examples.

The most immediate threat of a terrorist strike within Europe itself may come from the Maghreb. The French in particular are alarmed about the popularity of fundamentalists in Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria. They are furious with the British for what they see as a failure to crack down on Islamic clerics, many of them Algerian, operating from the Finsbury Park mosque in north London. In French diplomatic circles, they call it "Londonistan". The conspiracy theory -- that Britain is showing tolerance at home to head off bombings on its own soil -- is reinforced by the UK's long-standing refusal to extradite Rachid Ramda, an Algerian wanted for trial in France for bombings on the Paris Metro in 1995, which killed eight people. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Where Next? Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Argentina: Western Diplomats Warn That These and Many Other Countries Could Spawn Atrocities. Are Two Fronts Enough for Bush's War on Terrorism? (Cover Story)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.