Suing the Bastard Boss: Personal Liability of Supervisors for Workplace Sexual Harassment: Federal and State Civil Rights Statutes Are Poor Vehicles to Reach Offending Supervisors. Employers Themselves Should Discipline the Transgressors

By Jensen-Welch, Jill | Defense Counsel Journal, October 2002 | Go to article overview

Suing the Bastard Boss: Personal Liability of Supervisors for Workplace Sexual Harassment: Federal and State Civil Rights Statutes Are Poor Vehicles to Reach Offending Supervisors. Employers Themselves Should Discipline the Transgressors


Jensen-Welch, Jill, Defense Counsel Journal


TO WHAT extent are supervisors individually and personally liable for sexual harassment in employment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and under state law? What are the alternate causes of action?

Civil rights statutes are not suited to provide personal tort-like liability for wrong-doing manifested in the employment relationship. The government should not and cannot seek to legislate general respect and civility in the workplace by allowing employees to sue their supervisors, subordinates or colleagues under the guise of employment discrimination protection. Most statutory remedies for sexual harassment properly place the onus for a safe and productive workplace on the employer. For those few cases of particularly egregious harassment, where additional personal recourse against the offending employee may be warranted, current tort law provides sufficient redress. There is no need to stretch employment discrimination statutes to encompass individual liability, nor is a new tort needed.

INDIVIDUAL SUPERVISORY LIABILITY UNDER TITLE VII

A. Statutory Provisions

The pertinent portion of Title VII that has been construed to prohibit sexual harassment states:

      It shall be an unlawful practice for an employer to fail or refuse to
   hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against
   any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or
   privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color,
   religion, sex, or national origin. (1)

This section bears the heading "Unlawful employment practices," and the subheading covers "Employer practices." At first blush, it would appear that Title VII fixes liability only on employers, as there is no reference in this part of the statute to agent or individual liability.

Title VII goes on to define "employer" as:

      A person engaged in an industry affecting commerce who has fifteen or
   more employees for each working day in each of twenty of more calendar
   weeks in the current or preceding calendar year, and any agent of such a
   person. (2)

While there have been a plethora of cases, law review articles and treatises on the topic of Title VII employer liability for the acts of supervisors, (3) a somewhat less explored topic is whether Title VII places individual and personal liability on supervisors for their actions. (4) Specific to sexual harassment, all but one federal court of appeals has addressed the issue of individual liability under Title VII and found no support for such an interpretation. They are:

* Second Circuit: Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1314 (2d Cir. 1995);

* Third Circuit: Sheridan v. E.I. DuPont de Neumours & Co., 100 F.3d 1061, 1077 (3d Cir. 1996);

* Fourth Circuit: Lissau v. S. Food Service Inc., 159 F.3d 177, 180 (4th Cir. 1998);

* Fifth Circuit: lndest v. Freeman Decorating Inc., 164 F.3d 258, 262 (5th Cir. 1999);

* Sixth Circuit: Wathen v. General Electric Co., 115 F.3d 400, 405 (6th Cir. 1997);

* Seventh Circuit: Williams v. Banning, 72 F.3d 552, 555 (7th Cir. 1995);

* Eighth Circuit: Spencer v. Ripley County State Bank, 123 F.3d 690, 691-92 (8th Cir. 1997);

* Ninth Circuit: Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., 991 F.2d 583, 587-88 (9th Cir. 1993);

* 10th Circuit: Haynes v. Williams, 88 F.3d 898,901 (10th Cir. 1996);

* 11th Circuit: Busby v. City of Orlando, 931 F.2d 764, 772 (llth Cir. 1991); and

* D.C. Circuit: Gary v. Long, 59 F.3d 1391, 1399 (D.C. Cir. 1995).

Only the First Circuit has not yet squarely met the issue, and the controversy splits its five district courts? Three of the five district courts.(5) (New Hampshire, Maine and Puerto Rico) have consistently followed the majority rule; one (Rhode Island) has consistently followed the minority rule; one (Massachusetts) has used both rules, depending on the judge hearing the case. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Suing the Bastard Boss: Personal Liability of Supervisors for Workplace Sexual Harassment: Federal and State Civil Rights Statutes Are Poor Vehicles to Reach Offending Supervisors. Employers Themselves Should Discipline the Transgressors
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.