The Risk Management Implications of Premises Security

By Warfel, William J. | Risk Management, November 2002 | Go to article overview

The Risk Management Implications of Premises Security

Warfel, William J., Risk Management

The frequency of lawsuits filed behalf of crime victims who were attacked while on the premises of a commercial entity has increased dramatically since the mid-1980s. Media coverage of violent crime, victims looking for redress through civil litigation and an active plaintiff's bar have all contributed to this phenomenon. Few organizations are unaffected. Hospitals, hotels, office buildings, universities, convenience stores, retail shops, apartment complexes and shopping malls have all been targets. As a result, premises security has become yet another risk management responsibility.

Nature of Exposure

In premises security lawsuits, plaintiffs either allege that the commercial entity failed to provide adequate security or that it failed to eradicate conditions on the premises that foster criminal activity. Although defendants often prevail in these lawsuits, the defense costs are substantial--averaging between $18,000 and $53,000. Settlements typically range from $500,000 to $2.5 million, depending on the nature of the crime.

In a premises security case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed a legal duty to protect the plaintiff; that the defendant breached such duty; and that the breach of duty was a proximate cause of both the criminal act and the resulting injury to the plaintiff. Courts have delivered substantial verdicts in favor of plaintiffs. shifting additional financial responsibility to commercial entities.

Duty to Protect

Whether the defendant owes a legal duly to protect the plaintiff is a question of law, as opposed to a question of fact. If the defendant can prove it owes no duty (or the plaintiff can not prove it does). the case will not reach a jury. If the issue resolves in the plaintiff's favor, however, a case's settlement value dramatically increases once it is in the jury's hands.

In evaluating whether a duty to protect exists, courts have applied the following approaches:

* Knowledge of imminent criminal activity. Under this approach, liability is limited to circumstances under which the commercial entity had good reason to believe criminal activity was likely. If it failed to intercede to change those conditions and protect the plaintiff, it is held liable.

* Voluntary assumption of duty. Courts have found that organizations can indirectly assume a duty that did not previously exist. Normally in these cases, the entity undertakes a security measure after recognizing that an act of violence is possible. (Foreseeing the danger is thus a foregone conclusion.) The issue then turns on whether the defendant was negligent in providing protection against that threat. In Jardel v. Hughes (1987), for example, a shopping mall was held liable for injuries sustained by a tenant's employee who was abducted in the parking lot and raped nearby. The court reasoned that "having undertaken to provide a security program, albeit voluntarily, Jardel was obligated to perform the task in a reasonable manner with a view toward the dangers to which the program was directed."

* Contract. Seemingly innocuous contractual provisions in a lease--for example, pertaining to the general upkeep of the premises--may result in an open-ended premises security exposure for a landlord. If the plaintiff relied on the defendant to take appropriate security measures, a court may reason that providing security is an implied contractual obligation. In Furek v. University of Delaware (1991), for example, the court determined that establishing security for students is "an indispensable part of the bundle of services which colleges ... afford their students."

* Special relationships. In cases where the crime victim was on the defendant's premises for a purpose that was mutually beneficial to both parties (e.g., customers, delivery people, employees), courts are inclined to find a duty to protect. Such is the case if evidence suggests that the victim had in some way entrusted his or her safety to the defendant, and the defendant had accepted this duty. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Risk Management Implications of Premises Security


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.