Curbing Prosecutorial Misconduct in Capital Cases: Imposing Prohibitions on Improper Penalty Trial Arguments

By White, Welsh | American Criminal Law Review, Summer 2002 | Go to article overview

Curbing Prosecutorial Misconduct in Capital Cases: Imposing Prohibitions on Improper Penalty Trial Arguments


White, Welsh, American Criminal Law Review


 
  I. INTRODUCTION                                                 1147 
 II. WHY PER SE RULES ARE APPROPRIATE                             1157 
     A. Ensuring Reliability in Capital Sentencing                1158 
     B. Deterring Clearly Improper Penalty Arguments              1163 
III. CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING PER SE PROHIBITIONS ON 
     PROSECUTORS' PENALTY TRIAL ARGUMENTS                         1168 
 IV. EXAMPLES OF APPROPRIATE PER SE PROHIBITIONS                  1171 
     A. Argument that Misleads the Jury as to the Circumstances 
        under Which the Defendant Will be Released from Prison    1172 
     B. Argument that Relies Upon a Religious Text in Support of 
        Imposing the Death Penalty                                1177 
     C. Argument Referring to the Prosecutor's Discretionary 
        Decision to Seek the Death Penalty                        1179 
     D. Argument that the Death Penalty Should be Imposed to 
        Protect Society Rather than for Reasons Related to the 
        Facts of the Case                                         1181 
  V. CONCLUSION                                                   1184 

"You know, it's not always wrong to kill. It's maybe always difficult to kill; but if you kill in self-defense, that's not wrong. If you kill in a just war, that is not wrong. It's right. If somebody is going to kill your child and you have a chance to kill them to prevent it, would you do it? Of course. Kill Daryl Shurn." (2)

I. INTRODUCTION

In the face of mounting concerns about the operation of our system of capital punishment, (3) courts are likely to play a more active part in monitoring specific aspects of capital trials. Since 1972, when Furman v. Georgia (4) abolished the then-existing system of capital punishment, the Court has imposed significant constitutional restrictions on our system of capital punishment, thus requiring courts to monitor various aspects of capital sentencing. (5) Starting in the mid-eighties, however, both the Supreme Court and many lower courts have been reluctant to impede the imposition and carrying out of death penalties. (6) As a result, over the past five years, there have been more executions per year than at any time during the past four decades. (7) Recent concerns relating to both specific executions (8) and the overall application of the death penalty seem likely to alter courts' perception of their role in regulating our system of capital punishment.

If courts do decide to become more involved in monitoring our system of capital punishment, they may be inclined to begin by devoting closer attention to particular issues that arise in capital trials rather than addressing broad questions relating to the fairness of the system. (9) Since critics have identified prosecutorial misconduct as one of the significant causes of unfairness in capital sentencing, (10) scrutinizing prosecutors' arguments in capital cases, particularly their closing arguments during the penalty phase of capital trials, is an appropriate area of inquiry.

Most lawyers believe that their closing arguments play a critical part in shaping juries' decisions. The prosecutor's closing argument at the penalty trial of a capital case may be especially significant because of the context in which it occurs. In most death penalty trials, the prosecutor's argument occurs after the defendant has been convicted of a capital crime and both sides have been given an opportunity to present additional evidence relating to whether the defendant should be sentenced to death or given a lesser punishment. (11) The prosecutor is generally allowed to make the first closing argument and, if the defendant's counsel elects to make a closing argument, to make the final argument in rebuttal. (12) Thus, in most cases, the prosecutor's final closing argument will be the last words that the sentencing jury hears from either attorney. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Curbing Prosecutorial Misconduct in Capital Cases: Imposing Prohibitions on Improper Penalty Trial Arguments
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.