Marbury V. Madison: Bicentennial of a Landmark Decision. (Looking at the Law)

By Landman, James H. | Social Education, November-December 2002 | Go to article overview

Marbury V. Madison: Bicentennial of a Landmark Decision. (Looking at the Law)


Landman, James H., Social Education


The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing; if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained?

--Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison (1803)

THE YEAR 2003 will mark the bicentennial year of Marbury v. Madison, one of the most influential opinions of the United States Supreme Court. Authored by Chief Justice John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison affirmed the Court's power of judicial review--its ability to review congressional and executive acts and overturn those it deems unconstitutional. The case also established the federal judiciary's position as a co-equal, independent branch of the federal government.

Marbury v. Madison has had a lasting impact on Supreme Court adjudication, serving as a precedent for some of the Court's most famous (Brown v. Board of Education) and infamous (Dred Scott v. Sandford) decisions. It also underlies current debates over "judicial activism" and "judicial restraint."

The study of Marbury v. Madison opens numerous perspectives on American political and legal history. The case was at the center of debate between the Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans, offering insight into one of our nation's first great political struggles.

The power of judicial review established by Marbury has since defined many of the most significant eras in Supreme Court history--the Civil War, the Lochner-era Court of the early twentieth century, the New Deal, the civil rights movement, and the Court's recent turn toward federalism and states' rights. And the issue of judicial review raises questions central to our understanding of America's constitutional democracy. How is the voice of the people represented in our democracy? What gives the federal judiciary authority to invalidate laws passed by popularly elected representatives, given that federal judges are neither elected nor directly accountable to public opinion? What are the checks on the judiciary's power of judicial review?

This article first discusses Marbury v. Madison in its historical context and then offers a sketch of the opinion's legacy. Marbury v. Madison remains a vital part of Supreme Court jurisprudence and continues to shape our understanding of the powers our Constitution grants--and the limitations it places on--the branches of government at both the state and federal levels. In its bicentennial year, as questions about government power are again at the center of national debate, Marbury v. Madison deserves our study and attention more than ever.

"A Masterwork of Indirection": Marbury v. Madison in its Political Context

Marbury v. Madison has been described as a "masterwork of indirection, a brilliant example of [Chief Justice John] Marshall's capacity to sidestep danger while seeming to court it, to advance in one direction while his opponents are looking in another." (1) As these references to "danger" and "opponents" suggest, Marbury v. Madison was decided in a climate of considerable political risk for the Supreme Court. That the Court managed to emerge from this risk claiming the power of judicial review over congressional and executive actions is remarkable.

Marbury v. Madison has its roots in the waning days of John Adams's presidency and his Federalist Party's domination of Congress. Thomas Jefferson and his Republicans had just defeated Adams and the Federalists in the 1800 elections. The 1800 Republican victory has been seen "as a victory for democracy and as the culmination of a period of popular involvement in politics." (2) This emphasis on populism, combined with the actions of the Federalists in their final days of power, set the stage for a battle between Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists over the federal judiciary. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Marbury V. Madison: Bicentennial of a Landmark Decision. (Looking at the Law)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.