Beware of the Ostrich Factor

Sunday Business (London, England), January 13, 2002 | Go to article overview

Beware of the Ostrich Factor


AT first glance, the disastrous loss of the space shuttle Challenger 16 years ago this month, does not appear to hold any lessons for entrepreneurs or innovators.

After all, it was a faulty rubber seal on one of the solid rocket boosters that was to blame for the explosion that killed the Challenger's crew of seven astronauts, including Christa McAuliffe, the teacher who was the first civilian to take part in a space mission.

The disintegration of the seal 73 seconds into the flight let burning gases blowtorch their way into the shuttle's huge external fuel tank, with catastrophic results.

The tragic fact is Nasa engineers were warned that in the unusually cold temperatures of that January morning in 1986, the rubber seal could fail. They were also warned that the consequences could be disastrous.

But Nasa's engineers put pressure on the dissenting rocket scientists at Morton Thiokol - the company that built the solid fuel boosters - to rethink their advice to abandon the mission. After going into a huddle to reconsider, the team at Morton Thiokol eventually came back with the "correct" decision, to "go for launch".

The disaster and the decisions that led up to it have become a classic case in the study of "groupthink", a phenomenon described by social psychologist Irving Janis in the early 1970s.

Janis was curious to know how groups of experts could arrive at bad decisions in defiance of compelling evidence that they were about to get it horribly wrong. He was particularly interested in political fiascos such as the Bay of Pigs invasion and the refusal to recognise signs of the impending Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.

But groupthink exists everywhere that people make decisions under pressure to achieve results. In the financial world examples include the "buy" notes on Enron just weeks before it went bust and the more general reluctance of investment analysts to write "sell" notes, even when shares are obviously and preposterously overvalued.

In simple terms, Janis defined groupthink as the collective mindset of a closely knit group whose desire to conform leads them to switch off their critical faculties and no longer accept that there might be alternative ways of thinking.

He identified eight danger signs (see box) and it is not hard to see that many of them applied to dotcom entrepreneurs and their backers. The illusion of vulnerability and self-belief was particularly common, with young dot.commers believing that nobody could stop them changing the world. Outsiders and dissenters were derided and cast as unenterprising or old economy "dinosaurs" that just didn't "get it".

The symptom of collective rationalisation manifested itself in the belief that profits and cashflow were less important than user numbers and brand building; and in the widespread delusion that there was a "new economy" in which shares could only rise.

Self-censorship in the extended group - the financial world - ensured that internet stocks were always promoted by analysts as "strong buys", even if they had a price/earnings ratio as high as 1000 and an overwhelming probability of losing 90% of their value over the next year. After all, honest and critical analysis of stocks was bad for the booming capital markets business. Investment banks were making a fortune peddling shoddy goods at inflated prices to a gullible public.

For entrepreneurs and innovators working in small, highly cohesive start-ups, groupthink is often the result of trying to maintain internal harmony. It is the darker side of the entrepreneur's intrinsically overconfident nature.

"The worst form of groupthink is where you have a group that is closed to outsiders," says Professor Nick Chater, who is director of Warwick University's Institute for Applied Cognitive Science. "That is often the case with innovators, partly because of secrecy and partly because group members are technically specialised. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Beware of the Ostrich Factor
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.