Defending Cloning and Stem Cell Research against Faith-Based Curbs. (the New Bioethics)

By Hull, Richard T.; Flynn, Tom | Free Inquiry, Winter 2002 | Go to article overview

Defending Cloning and Stem Cell Research against Faith-Based Curbs. (the New Bioethics)


Hull, Richard T., Flynn, Tom, Free Inquiry


Heated controversy surrounds today's efforts to develop ethics by which to manage emerging biotechnologies. Since President Bush's August 9, 2001, decision to limit federally funded stem cell research to existing lines, debate has swung back and forth on issues such as whether adult stem cells are as pluripotent as embryonic ones (they aren't) and whether the existing lines are adequate to permit scientific evaluation of embryonic stem cells' potential (they aren't).

On November 28, 2001, President Bush created the President's Council on Bioethics to study the issue of cloning for reproduction and cloning for biomedical research, and to report with policy recommendations. That report was issued in July 2002. All seventeen Council members voted to ban reproductive cloning; seven voted to ban cloning for research purposes, three favored a moratorium, and seven voted to permit cloning for research to proceed now, with regulation.

The report expressed the concern of conservatives that "society (and not only the embryos) will suffer irreversible moral harm by crossing the boundary that allows nascent human life routinely to be treated as a natural resource." This view turns on seeing embryos at their earliest stages as identical with humans that will, if those embryos are allowed to develop, clearly exist. This key belief, as well as the tactics of some of its proponents, deserves careful investigation. For, if it cannot stand up to non-theistic philosophical analysis, basing governmental policy on it crosses the boundary separating church and state.

FREE INQUIRY and the Council for Secular Humanism have long been active in this debate. Consistently we have defended approaches that respect the freedom of scientific inquiry. (1) Consistently we have opposed arbitrary limits on research rooted primarily in preconceived ideas, including traditional religious doctrines. In 1997, the Council issued "A Declaration in Defense of Cloning and the Integrity of Scientific Research." Thirty-one leaders in biology, philosophy, ethics, and other fields signed this document, which the defended the inherent moral licitness of biotechnologies including human cloning. (2)

Public debate is just that--public--and one can never be certain what use others may make of one's statements. In March of 2001, we were startled to hear that the "Declaration in Defense of Cloning" had been distributed in the halls of Congress . …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Defending Cloning and Stem Cell Research against Faith-Based Curbs. (the New Bioethics)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.