Georges I & II Limited Monarchs: Jeremy Black Reminds Us of the Importance of Two of Britain's Less Well-Loved Monarchs

By Black, Jeremy | History Today, February 2003 | Go to article overview

Georges I & II Limited Monarchs: Jeremy Black Reminds Us of the Importance of Two of Britain's Less Well-Loved Monarchs


Black, Jeremy, History Today


THE FIRST TWO Hanoverians, George I (r. 1714-27) and his son George II (r. 1727-60), have not had a terribly good press. Unpopular with their contemporaries, they have not subsequently been seen as great rulers. George I is chiefly remembered for his personal life, not least the thirty-year incarceration of his adulterous wife, Sophia Dorothea (1666-1726), the disappearance of her lover Philipp Christoph von Konigsmarck in 1694, and George's subsequent attachment to the Duchess of Kendal. George II is generally seen as a headstrong, blinkered boor, manipulated in his early years as king by his wile, Queen Caroline (1683-1737), and by his chief minister Sir Robert Walpole (1676-1745). Neither has left much correspondence to provide his own point of view or to offer sympathetic insights on character and goals.

Yet both men played a major role in the development of the British monarchy. Their reigns were crucial for the solid establishment of the constitutional and political conventions and practices known as the Revolution Settlement after James II and VII's replacement by William III in 1689. The legislation that made it up (which included the 1701 Act of Settlement enshrining the claim to the British throne of Sophia of Hanover, mother of the future George I was passed from 1689, but much of the political settlement was not solidified until after 1714. In particular, the defeat of the Jacobite uprising of 1715-16 marked a triumph over forces opposed to the new order. This triumph was repeated in a clash of dynasties in 1746 when the army that crushed Charles Edward Stuart at Culloden was, significantly, led by George II's second and favourite son, William, Duke of Cumberland.

The reigns were also important because they determined the character of the Anglo-Hanoverian monarchy. Although the consequences of this new polity were less dramatic than those stemming from the personal union of England and Scotland under James VI and I in 1603, this had been by no means clear when the new dynastic personal union was created.

Britain-Hanover was similar to Poland-Saxony. In each case a state with a degree of public participatory politics (Britain and Poland) found itself linked to one that was more clearly the expression of a ruling house (Hanover and Saxony). This led both to serious problems of adjustment at the domestic level and to an attempt to create a degree of unity at the international level that aroused controversy.

Both George I and George II sought to use British resources to help secure gains for Hanover. George I sought to win territories from the partition of the Swedish empire and to place a westward limit on the expansion of Russian power under Peter the Great. George II pursued Hanoverian territorial interests in neighbouring principalities, especially in Mecklenburg, East Friesland and Osnabruck. As a leading Protestant power, Hanover was also involved in the defence of confessional interests, especially during the reign of George I. Both rulers also sought to counter Hanoverian vulnerability to attack from France or Prussia. These ambitions and interests of Georges I and II maintained the dynamism of Hanoverian policy: one that was unwise and unsuccessful in itself, and a source of concern and anger to numerous British ministers and diplomats. Public criticism in Britain of the kings' lengthy visits to Hanover was intense.

The Hanoverian ambitions of both kings made their British ministries vulnerable to domestic criticism and Hanover itself to foreign attack, but they learned, however reluctantly, to accept the limitations of their position. By 1721, it was abundantly clear that the territorial ambitions of George I had been disappointed, and the same was apparent for George II by 1748 when he had to accept that Hanover would make no gains from the War of the Austrian Succession, whereas his hated nephew, Frederick the Great of Prussia, had seized Silesia and East Friesland, thus ensuring that Prussia, not Hanover or Saxony, became the major North German power. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Georges I & II Limited Monarchs: Jeremy Black Reminds Us of the Importance of Two of Britain's Less Well-Loved Monarchs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.