The Humanist Critique of Metaphysics and the Foundation of the Political Order

By Yoran, Hanan | Utopian Studies, Spring 2002 | Go to article overview

The Humanist Critique of Metaphysics and the Foundation of the Political Order


Yoran, Hanan, Utopian Studies


IN EXAMINING ENGLAND'S BREAK with Papal Rome, G.R. Elton argued that in addition to creating the national state, the Tudor revolution "demonstrated that in law and on earth there is nothing that an act of parliament cannot do." Elton described how radically new this concept was--and how incompatible it was with contemporary thought. "It took centuries of talk about the law divine and the law natural, with which the law made by man was supposed to be consonant, before men would admit in all its starkness [this] simple theory" (167-68). Elton had identified the tension that existed between, on the one hand, the modern notion of the state already implicit in sixteenth-century political practices and, on the other hand, pre-modern concepts of the political order that continued to prevail in consciousness and culture.

This article examines a similar ambivalence that characterized the way humanist thought addressed questions about the political order. Humanism rejected the metaphysics and theology that had informed the pre-modern understanding of human reality. This implied a rejection of a metaphysical or theological foundations of the political order. Humanist political discourse did not view politics as reflecting a natural or divine order of things. It presupposed, rather, that politics was a human creation. Such views, as Elton noted, contradicted entrenched beliefs. As a result a tension developed between humanist discourse and the religious and moral convictions of the humanists themselves.

Because most humanists did not draw the radical conclusions that were immanent to their discourse, this tension usually remained latent. However, it surfaced in some of the more significant works written by humanists. Two of these will be the subject of discussion here. Lorenzo Valla's On the True and the False Good and Thomas More's Utopia each advanced the humanist critique of the metaphysical underpinnings of traditional ethics and political thought, and each acknowledged the radical implications of this critique. As a consequence, these two works confronted questions concerning the foundation, or rather the lack of foundation, of the political order.

Valla (1407-57) develops a humanist critique of moral philosophy, which he replaced with a naturalist ethics of pleasure. He also explicated what radical implications his position held for social life. Ultimately, however, he attempted to rehabilitate traditional values by anchoring them in faith, a Christian faith divorced from reason. More's rejection of the existing social and political order, as well as his Utopian alternative, rests on humanist assumptions and critical insights similar to Valla's. Indeed, Utopia's most ambitious attempt to justify the Utopian order of things is grounded in an ethics of pleasure (seemingly) identical to that elaborated in On the True and False Good. In contrast to Valla, however, More (1478-1535) did not turn to religion in reinventing a foundation for the political order. He attempted, and failed, to create a theoretical basis for the Utopian order within humanist political discourse. In recognizing this failure and Utopia's attempt to hide it, this essay reads More's text as testimony to the humanists' inability to face the implications of their discourse. Utopia thus becomes a symptom of the inherent tension between the modernity of humanist discourse and the pre-modern culture and mentality to which the humanists still belonged.

More importantly, Valla's and More's unsuccessful attempts to grapple with the problem of the foundation of politics is a reflection of the discontents of modernity itself: our reluctance to admit that there is no ultimate grounding of (or perhaps for, but certainly not in] the political order.

Humanist political discourse

A growing number of studies of Renaissance humanism reveal a cultural movement of great heterogeneity. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Humanist Critique of Metaphysics and the Foundation of the Political Order
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.