Organizational Models for Collaboration in the New Economy

By DeFillippi, Robert J. | Human Resource Planning, December 2002 | Go to article overview

Organizational Models for Collaboration in the New Economy

DeFillippi, Robert J., Human Resource Planning

Technology Drivers and Collaboration

The new economy is a knowledge-based economy without borders, where the race is between companies and locales over how to learn faster and organize more flexibly to take advantage of technology-enabled market opportunities (Kelly, 1998; Best, 2001). Within this new economy, the World Wide Web is ubiquitous. It has transformed geographically separated locales into a "global village" for information sharing, social interaction, and economic exchange. Technology, in particular, ever-expanding digital bandwidth, has resulted in the creation of new-economy forms of intangible, knowledge-based capital, the value of which now exceeds that of the physical capital that once dominated old economies (Castells, 2000; Tapscott, et al., 2000). Whereas old-economy business models emphasized organizationally defined tasks and roles, new-economy business models value self-organizing teams, companies, and industry-based clusters or communities of networked firms and institutions to meet the changing requirements of innovative projects, the boundaries of which transcend the rigidities of old-economy hierarchies. The perspective taken in this article asserts that the careers and work experiences of new-economy workers are interdependent with their involvement in Web-enabled teams, companies, and social and industry communities through which project work is accomplished (see Exhibit 1).

We evidenced a shift from immobile-wired infrastructures to mobile, miniature, and wireless modes of communication, computing, and transacting. Customers demand "any time, any place" solutions of their problems. Such demands have led companies to invest in creating online business processes and services as either substitutes or supplements to brick-and-mortar service offerings (Gulati & Garino, 2000). Moreover, by compressing the time cycles for satisfying customer requirements, companies now face unprecedented organizational challenges in adapting their human resources and organizational practices to the fast-moving business environment. Rigid organizational routines will destroy economic value when market and technological requirements advance (Leonard-Barton, 1995).

Innovative enterprises that employ technology to facilitate independent, project-based collaborations are the hallmark of the new economy (Quinn, et al., 1997). Such collaborations can range from arms-length information sharing to highly interdependent joint cooperation in the creation of new products and services (Best, 2001). Information technology now makes possible a variety of collaborative workspaces for project teams, companies, and industry clusters or networks. In the sections to follow, we examine each of these modes of collaboration and assess the opportunities and challenges for HR managers and their new economy knowledge workers.

Technology, Teams, and Trust

The new economy's performance demands and its technology tools are affecting the way in which project teams are organized. First, in the old economy, companies facing predictably long-term and stable demands for products and services could create work teams of relatively long duration. But new-economy companies face much shorter demand cycles and less-predictable customer requirements. As a result, new-economy companies must be able to create and dissolve teams rapidly in response to rapidly changing requirements. Team members must be prepared to change their team affiliations frequently and effectively and efficiently to collaborate with new team members on new projects. Such short-lived teams challenge more orthodox notions of building group cohesion and commitment over time (Mullen & Copper, 1994).

Second, old-economy companies were typically staffed through stable, long-standing organizational units, so that marketing departments had marketing teams, engineering departments had engineering teams, and project boundaries largely reflected internal organizational arrangements. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Organizational Models for Collaboration in the New Economy


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.