A Great Divide: Europe and America Are Largely Split over Whether a War to Change the Regime in Iraq Is Now Justified. but the Divisions Go Much Deeper Than That-To Differing Perceptions of History and Politics, Power and God

By Dickey, Christopher | Newsweek, February 24, 2003 | Go to article overview

A Great Divide: Europe and America Are Largely Split over Whether a War to Change the Regime in Iraq Is Now Justified. but the Divisions Go Much Deeper Than That-To Differing Perceptions of History and Politics, Power and God


Dickey, Christopher, Newsweek


Byline: Christopher Dickey

Lines of crosses, thousands upon thousands overlooking the beaches of Normandy, bear witness to the vast wars that raged across Europe in the last century and to the blood of Americans who lost their lives in them. People in the United States are remembering those crosses these days, and that blood, and wondering why so many Europeans seem not to remember. Because right now Americans are under threat. And Americans are about to go to war with the murderous regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq. And when they look at their old allies like the French--especially the French--what they see are perfidious diplomats trying to wriggle out of any risky commitment: "cheese-eating surrender monkeys," in a memorable phrase right-wing commentators picked up from "The Simpsons" cartoon show.

Those tensions were fully on display last week at the United Nations Security Council when it convened to hear the latest report from chief inspector Hans Blix. He had come to explain just how much Saddam Hussein has--or has not--complied with demands that Iraq disarm. Under Resolution 1441, Blix essentially has the power to launch the war by declaring that Saddam is stonewalling. If Blix agreed with the damning assessment given by Secretary of State Colin Powell on Feb. 5, it would be hard to stop a new resolution in favor of force. But Blix didn't do that. Rather, he chipped away at Powell's version of events, citing points that seemed to be exaggerated, while conceding that Saddam was keeping illegal missiles. The administration and its British supporters were stunned. "Everyone thought he would give us more to work with," as one official put it. (BLIXED! cried the headline on London's Daily Mail.)

Blix's presentation set the tone for the extraordinary spectacle that followed. The room--the Security Council--was palpably turning against the United States. When French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin spoke, he had a rapt audience. "The use of force against Iraq is not justified today; there is an alternative to war, and that is to disarm Iraq through inspections," he declared. The chamber erupted in applause. When Powell's turn came, he put aside his prepared notes. He spoke directly, passionately, warning against "tricks that are being played on us" and vowed that "the threat of force must remain." Saddam could not be allowed to string this process out. "We cannot wait for one of these weapons [of mass destruction] to turn up in our cities. More inspections--I am sorry--are not the answer." But when Powell finished, only a sole hand clap could be heard in the entire chamber. Then the room fell silent as the clapper realized that he was quite alone.

The whole idea of a war against Iraq was looking last week like an increasingly lonely venture for the Bush administration and its stalwart supporter, British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Even as the number of American troops poised for fighting in Iraq approached 150,000, some 750,000 or more protesters marched against the war in London, and hundreds of thousands more turned out in other capitals. Many worry that an attack on Baghdad will make them less safe, by provoking more terrorism. And they believe inspections can contain Saddam. All last week the usually low-key councils of NATO were seized by a bitter squabble as France, Germany and Belgium stalled efforts to guarantee Turkey protection if it helps facilitate an American invasion of Iraq. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld called the action a "disgrace." Suddenly surrender monkeys seemed to be all over the place.

The rancor had been building for months, stoked at times by aggressive posturing from the American side. On Jan. 23, Rumsfeld started baiting reluctant France and recalcitrant Germany as the "old Europe." Congressmen picked up the theme as France emerged as the key spoiler in NATO and the U.N. Security Council. Rep. Tom Lantos, among others, declared he was "disgusted by the blind intransigence and utter ingratitude. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Great Divide: Europe and America Are Largely Split over Whether a War to Change the Regime in Iraq Is Now Justified. but the Divisions Go Much Deeper Than That-To Differing Perceptions of History and Politics, Power and God
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.