The Day That Democracy Came Back from the Dead; Last November, Anthony Sampson Wrote Here That Democracy Was Dying. Today He Recants, Saying This Week's Commons Debate Was Greater Than the One He Heard at the Time of Suez

By Sampson, Anthony | Daily Mail (London), February 28, 2003 | Go to article overview

The Day That Democracy Came Back from the Dead; Last November, Anthony Sampson Wrote Here That Democracy Was Dying. Today He Recants, Saying This Week's Commons Debate Was Greater Than the One He Heard at the Time of Suez


Sampson, Anthony, Daily Mail (London)


Byline: ANTHONY SAMPSON

THE EXTRAORDINARY debate in the Commons on Wednesday was much more than a significant protest against the Government's policy over Iraq. It was a historic reassertion of Parliament's role as the guardian of democracy.

Three months ago, I wrote in the Mail about the growing dictatorial powers of the Prime Minister and the weakening of those institutions - the House of Lords, the Judiciary, a strong Opposition - who should keep his powers in check. It was, I suggested, tantamount to the death of democracy in this country.

But this week we have seen a counterattack from Parliament which must give MPs new confidence and self-respect - and should compel the Government to rethink their defiance of democratic institutions and public opinion.

I watched it from the Press gallery - a place I had not been in for years. I wanted to compare it with the debate on the Suez Crisis which I had watched more than 46 years ago.

That was a lesson in democracy I never forgot, as I looked down from the packed gallery at the legendary characters below, including the figure of Churchill sitting just below me.

Back then, I had been dazzled by the rhetoric and repartee. After Foreign Secretary Selwyn Lloyd had defended the Suez intervention, the brilliant Labour speaker Nye Bevan furiously mocked him, until the PM, Anthony Eden, walked in. 'Why do we attack the monkey,' said Bevan, 'when the organ-grinder is here?'

Returning to Westminster on Wednesday, I was preparing to reflect sadly about the decline of Parliament, to bathe in nostalgia for those bygone giants who could debate world affairs with passion and integrity. What pygmies today's Parliamentarians would seem by comparison.

I arrived just after the opening speeches, and expected to stay an hour; perhaps to retreat for tea if the debate became too tedious.

Instead I was transfixed, sitting there for over four hours until the debate drew to a conclusion. I was eavesdropping on live history, sitting in the same chamber as people who, whatever Mr Blair may say, were deciding whether Britain should go to war in Iraq or not.

It was the same kind of gripping theatre I had watched in 1956, and equally serious. More surprisingly, Wednesday's speakers were better informed about the world they talked about than those of 1956 - not least because many had constituents from the Middle Eastern countries they discussed.

But this time the plot was more unexpected, the storyline more original and the cast more varied. There were fewer stock characters like the backbenchers of the Fifties - the familiar chorus of trades unionists on the Left, or the rows of pinstriped fogeys waving orderpapers on the Right.

And this time, more performers on both sides were keeping the audience in suspense, making them wonder on which side they would come down, and behaving apparently out of character.

Fogey-looking former Tory ministers like Douglas Hogg and Selwyn Gummer gave passionate, anguished speeches coming out against the war.

One of the mildest Labour MPs, former Cabinet minister Chris Smith, delivered one of the most effective attacks on Blair. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Day That Democracy Came Back from the Dead; Last November, Anthony Sampson Wrote Here That Democracy Was Dying. Today He Recants, Saying This Week's Commons Debate Was Greater Than the One He Heard at the Time of Suez
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.