The Hearsay Rule and Delayed Complaints of Child Sexual Abuse: The Law and the Evidence

By Cossins, Anne | Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, November 2002 | Go to article overview

The Hearsay Rule and Delayed Complaints of Child Sexual Abuse: The Law and the Evidence


Cossins, Anne, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law


This article discusses the implications of two recent High Court cases on the admissibility of hearsay evidence of a child's delayed disclosure of child sexual abuse. It compares and contrasts the traditional legal significance of delayed disclosure (as being evidence of fabrication) with prevalence studies from the psychological literature which show that a majority of children delay disclosure and that, rather than being an aberrant feature of child sexual abuse, delay is a typical response of sexually abused children as a result of confusion, denial, self-blame and overt and covert threats by offenders. In addition, several self-report studies of offenders confirm that grooming processes create a relationship of power between the child and offender such that delayed disclosure appears to reflect the position of powerlessness of the sexually abused child within that relationship. In light of what the psychological literature tells us, this article challenges the narrow legal approach to the admissibility of hearsay evidence of delayed disclosure and suggests that a special exception should be made for hearsay statements of a child's delayed disclosure in child sexual assault trials.

**********

The accepted wisdom about the rules of evidence that apply in the criminal trial is that they "ensure that the trial process is fair for [both] parties" to the proceedings (Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) and Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC), 1997, p. 322). Contrary to this accepted wisdom, however, child sexual assault has been identified as one of the most difficult crimes to prosecute (Brereton and Cole, 1991; Cashmore, 1995; Parliament of Victoria, Crime Prevention Committee, 1995; Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service, 1997) (1), not least because the rules of evidence in the adversarial trial have the potential to prevent a child complainant from fully explaining their evidence and to prevent that evidence from being assessed in the actual context in which the assault is alleged to have occurred. In particular, children can be effectively silenced as witnesses due to the existence of common law "[c]ompetency rules, judicial warnings regarding children's evidence, rules against hearsay and prohibitions on expert testimony and on tendency and coincidence evidence" (ALRC and the HREOC, 1997, p. 322). In fact, the Royal Commission into the New South Wales Police Service (1997, p. 1090) commented that the sexual assault trial has always been "peculiarly weighted" against a child complainant for these reasons, as well as the expectation that a child witness should give evidence in the same ways as adults in the witness box in the presence of the accused.

Whilst a number of reforms have been introduced in recent years to address some of these problems, such as legislation which enables a child, in some jurisdictions, to give evidence from a remote room via CCTV (ALRC and HREOC, 1997, p. 304-352), a review of the NSW case law indicates that the traditional common law approach to issues such as lack of corroboration, delays in complaint and tendency evidence (Cossins, 1999; 2001; R v OGD (No.2) [2000] NSWCCA 404) still operates to de-contextualise the unique circumstances surrounding the sexual abuse of children.

This article examines two recent decisions by the High Court of Australia which concern the admissibility of hearsay statements of recent and delayed complaint in sexual assault trials and discusses the implications of these cases for the reception of such evidence in child sexual assault trials in NSW. The article then contrasts the legal approach to the perceived problems of admitting the hearsay statements of a child's delayed complaint with a number of psychological studies that have documented the frequency of, and reasons for, delayed disclosures of child sexual abuse. Finally, the article discusses the implications of these studies for the admissibility of hearsay evidence of a child's delayed disclosure in a child sexual assault trial. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Upgrade your membership to receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad‑free environment

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Hearsay Rule and Delayed Complaints of Child Sexual Abuse: The Law and the Evidence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved in your active project from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Upgrade your membership to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.