In Ukraine, Homegrown Freedom
Diuk, Nadia, The Christian Science Monitor
There was something familiar about the atmosphere in Kiev last week. I had the same feeling as a student in Warsaw in 1980, when massive street demonstrations and the emergence of the Solidarity trade union threw Poland's Communist government into confusion. At that time, just one gesture, or the display of a symbol - the red- and-white logo of Solidarity - conveyed a whole set of aspirations, attitudes, and emotions. Now the color orange is the symbol throughout Kiev. Everyone understands what's at stake, and everyone stands united. The Czechs jingled keys, the Serbs showed a fist, the Georgians adopted the rose, and now the Ukrainians wear orange.
Some have sought to portray the events in Ukraine as orchestrated by the West, a model executed with the support of Western pro- democracy foundations. Such views have been pushed by Kremlin spin doctors. But there's no real mystery about how these kinds of revolutions happen.
In all the "breakthrough" elections in the past five years, the pattern has been much the same: An authoritarian regime tries to falsify elections through a variety of means. This is common in Central Asia and in other dictatorships, but what made the elections in Slovakia in 1998, Serbia in 2000, and Georgia in 2003 different was the combined pressure on the authorities of a highly motivated and unified civil society, the credible exposure of fraud, and expressions of concern from the West.
In each of these situations there was a massive effort by nongovernmental organizations to monitor the vote with parallel vote tabulations, exit polls, or reports from domestic observers. These strategies were supported by reports of Western election observers. In Ukraine the same independent polling group that almost precisely predicted the March 2002 parliamentary election results has done exit polling for parliamentary and presidential elections since 1995. Ukraine also has a seasoned civic group, the Committee of Voters, that has trained and fielded tens of thousands of domestic election observers since the mid-1990s.
None of these efforts would have any resonance without some free media to spread news of voter fraud. Limited free media were vital in Georgian elections. In Ukraine, although the electronic media were obliged to report the news under instruction from the president's administration, some notable and heroic holdouts ran round-the-clock reports and interviews with protest leaders and officials; they also provided air time for the steady cascade of journalists defecting from state-controlled TV, diplomats who signed a statement of protest against the fraudulent elections, and a motley array of others, including pop stars. …