World's Nations Close to Pact on GATT Clinton Calls Exports U.S.'S `Lifeblood'

By Compiled From News Services | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), December 4, 1993 | Go to article overview

World's Nations Close to Pact on GATT Clinton Calls Exports U.S.'S `Lifeblood'


Compiled From News Services, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


RONALD REAGAN proposed it. George Bush came within a whisker of finishing it. Bill Clinton may claim it as the crowning foreign policy achievement of his presidency.

Nearly eight years after they began, worldwide negotiations aimed at lowering trade barriers appear headed toward an agreement that supporters say will dramatically stimulate economic growth worldwide.

Trade negotiators gathered Friday in Geneva to work toward final compromises. The chief problem remained a dispute between the United States and the European Community over protection for European farm products, primarily those from France.

Clinton spoke with French President Francois Mitterrand and Premier Edouard Balladur on Friday, White House press secretary Dee Dee Myers said. She said they discussed "outstanding issues" including agriculture.

"Both affirmed a commitment to getting something done," she said.

About 100 French farmers blocked trains Friday near Vichy in central France, responding to calls by farm groups to protest any agreement to cut subsidies or production.

Should Americans care about GATT?

Exports are "the lifeblood of our economic growth," according to Clinton.

"This is the only international jobs bill around," says Republican Bill Frenzel, a former Minnesota congressman and a trade specialist.

Clinton, Frenzel and other supporters of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade believe that well over half the new jobs generated in the United States over the next decade will come from goods and services that Americans will sell to foreign consumers. A report presented at Friday's trade meeting predicted that GATT would increase world trade by at least $745 billion a year and world income by $230 billion a year, by 2005.

Conversely, if the GATT negotiations fail, there is a real possibility of regional trade wars, isolating the European Community, Asia and North America and slowing growth.

There will be some losers among U.S. companies if the final round of negotiations end with an agreement among the 116 participating nations, as expected over the next few days. But overall, there is a broad consensus that the impact of GATT will be many times that of the North American Free Trade Agreement, approved by Congress last month after a brutal political battle.

"This is far, far more important than NAFTA," said Barry Bosworth, an economist at the Brookings Institution and a White House adviser in the Carter administration. "The fight over NAFTA was about low-wage jobs we were going to lose anyway. GATT gives a huge advantage to high technology and research, which this country does best."

Among the U.S. winners are likely to be high-tech computer makers, grain farmers, investment firms, television producers, pharmaceutical companies, tractor and heavy truck manufacturers and hundreds of service industries eager to do business abroad.

Frenzel, who helped Clinton push NAFTA through Congress, said there might now be a worldwide agreement because, "Leaders everywhere don't like what their economies are doing.

"Europe is flat, its industrial powers are down, the U.S. growth is slow and Japan is in a recession like it hasn't experienced for 20 years," he said. "That is not a pleasant world picture. Leaders are beginning to understand that without liberalized trade, we are going to have an even more unpleasant decade."

Although GATT may help the United States in the long run, there will undoubtedly be some industries that have traditionally been protected from foreign competition - either by high tariffs or quotas - that will be hurt. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

World's Nations Close to Pact on GATT Clinton Calls Exports U.S.'S `Lifeblood'
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.