Thomas Making Mark in Court Decisions Distinctive, Conservative Judicial Voice Developing

By William H. Freivogel Of the Post-Dispatch | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), May 28, 1995 | Go to article overview

Thomas Making Mark in Court Decisions Distinctive, Conservative Judicial Voice Developing


William H. Freivogel Of the Post-Dispatch, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


Clarence Thomas has emerged as a significant voice on the U.S. Supreme Court, where he is the strongest advocate for interpreting the Constitution the way the Framers meant it.

"His work goes a long way to refuting the notion that this is someone who does not have the breadth to be a Supreme Court justice," says Richard J. Lazarus, a law professor at Washington University. "One can disagree with him and think he is misguided, but you cannot read these opinions and think this is someone who does not have the command of legal argument."

Jesse Choper, law professor at the University of California at Berkeley, agrees: "He is not being given sufficient recognition for what he is doing. I think his opinions are generally good."

In four terms on the court, Thomas has developed a distinctive judicial voice:

- He's the most conservative justice on a conservative court. Thomas' constitutional views would reinvigorate states' rights and diminish federal power.

- He's the most consistent advocate of the "originalist" approach that limits the Constitution to its original meaning.

- He's the second most prolific opinion writer this term, even though he continues to be the quietest justice in oral argument.

- He's passionate in his opinion writing, even though he remains passionless on the bench.

- He's a firm believer in "textualism," insisting, like soulmate Antonin Scalia, that words be given their plain, dictionary meanings.

Rumors have circulated that Thomas relies on Scalia or law clerks for his opinions. Choper, himself a former clerk, says that "law clerks do a lot for a lot of justices" but that justices should get credit for opinions.

Thomas characteristically made heavy use of his dictionaries and history texts in three recent opinions notable for their originalist approach.

On April 19, Thomas joined a 7-2 majority in striking down a state law regulating anonymous leaflets. The other justices in the majority based their decision on the "honorable tradition" of anonymous speech.

Thomas disagreed with their reasoning, saying that the original understanding of the First Amendment, not tradition, was what mattered. He quoted a 1905 Supreme Court decision: "The Constitution is a written instrument. As such its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted, it means now."

***** Not Far Enough

Then, on April 26, Thomas wrote a separate opinion as part of the majority in U.S. vs. Lopez. The court ruled 5-4 that Congress had exceeded its power under the Commerce Clause by passing a federal law against carrying a gun near a school.

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist's majority opinion was the first time in 60 years that the court had struck down congressional exercise of its commerce powers. Yet Thomas thought Rehnquist hadn't gone far enough.

Citing definitions from four dictionaries, Thomas argued that the Framers didn't consider "manufacturing" as "commerce."

If Thomas' original understanding were adopted by the court, all sorts of legislation passed since the New Deal could be out the window - the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Minimum Wage Act and the National Labor Relations Act, to name three.

Thomas' interpretation of commerce might also threaten the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed under Congress' commerce powers.

No one joined Thomas in Lopez. But he came within one vote of a majority in U.S. Term Limits vs. Thornton, in which the court struck down terms limits on members of Congress. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Thomas Making Mark in Court Decisions Distinctive, Conservative Judicial Voice Developing
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.