Labor Opposition May Scuttle `Employee Team' Bill

By Tim Poor Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), October 1, 1995 | Go to article overview

Labor Opposition May Scuttle `Employee Team' Bill


Tim Poor Post-Dispatch Washington Bureau, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


A move to allow nonunion businesses to set up teams of employees to address working conditions won by a narrow vote in Congress last week, but it may be a short-lived victory.

Opponents, including organized labor and President Bill Clinton's administration, are dimming the chances for the legislation, which they say is a thinly disguised attempt to permit the resurgence of "company unions" that would thwart attempts to unionize.

The measure would amend federal labor laws banning nonunion employers from hand-picking groups of workers to determine such things as wages and benefits. The House approved the bill Wednesday by a vote of 221-202; a similar version is pending in a Senate committee.

In recent years, many companies have taken a team approach to management, giving employees more say in how the companies are run on issues such as safety and productivity. But some of the team plans have run afoul of the National Labor Relations Board, which has said the teams crossed the line and got into areas barred by the law.

Supporters of the bill argued it was needed to give companies more leeway in improving cooperation between workers and bosses.

"These are a very flexible, diverse kind of way to get employees involved in making decisions which otherwise would have to be made entirely by management," said Rep. James M. Talent, R-Chesterfield, one of the bill's leading backers.

He said the bill would not end the ban on "company unions" and that employers would still be barred from interfering with workers' attempts to organize.

Leading the opposition on the House floor was Rep. William L. Clay, D-St. Louis.

He said the bill "undermines workplace democracy and threatens the very foundation of collective bargaining." He said the bill wasn't needed, as evidenced by the many such plans now in effect without challenge.

One such plan struck down by the NLRB was set up by EFCO Corp., a company that makes windows in the southwest Missouri town of Monett. In March, an administrative law judge ordered the company to disband its four "employee involvement committees" because they were management-dominated labor organizations barred by the National Labor Relations Act.

Sen. John Ashcroft, R-Mo., cited the order in a letter May 10 to Labor Secretary Robert Reich. Ashcroft said the case was one of 16 suits filed by the board since 1993 that have had "a chilling effect on the implementation of such programs by companies. In order for businesses to succeed in today's economy, labor laws must be updated to allow workers to have input on all levels of the decision making process without causing the company to be hauled into court. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Labor Opposition May Scuttle `Employee Team' Bill
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.