Point of Law: Juries Entitled to Ignore It the Power of Nullification Puts Activists, Jurists at Odds

By Fred W. Lindecke Missouri Political Correspondent | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), October 25, 1995 | Go to article overview

Point of Law: Juries Entitled to Ignore It the Power of Nullification Puts Activists, Jurists at Odds


Fred W. Lindecke Missouri Political Correspondent, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


YOU MAY HAVE missed this exchange during the closing arguments of the O.J. Simpson trial.

You can bet that Frank Nugent of Oakland, a member of the Fully Informed Jury Association, didn't.

Marcia Clark: "I've never seen counsel ask for jury nullification in this way."

Judge Ito: "It was very artfully phrased."

For a fleeting moment, jury nullification, a little-known but important point of law dating back to the Magna Carta of 1215, received worldwide attention in the Simpson case.

For an instant, Nugent's pet issue was in the limelight.

Prosecutor Marcia Clark was complaining to Judge Lance Ito about defense attorney Johnnie Cochran's tactics with the jury.

Here's a definition.

Jury nullification: the power of a jury to reject a judge's instructions or not to apply a law to a defendant if it believes the result would be injustice.

In other words, juries can ignore the law if they want to acquit. That happened a lot before the Civil War when juries refused to convict abolitionists who helped runaway slaves.

Juries cannot, however, ignore the law if they want to convict.

It's a funny thing about this issue.

Opponents of jury nullification - and they are many - cite no legal precedent that says juries do not have this power. Instead, opponents argue that juries should not be told they have this power. They say chaos will break out if jurors ignore judges' instructions and decide laws should not be obeyed in certain cases.

Some opponents go further. They say juries should be told they do not have the power to ignore the law if they want to acquit.

They say jury nullification occurs too often. To advertise this inherent power of juries would produce anarchy across the nation.

Nugent and the Fully Informed Jury Association are in the business of advertising this power.

Nugent, a retired insurance executive, is the Missouri coordinator for the association. The association has 3,000 members nationwide and chapters in every state.

Nugent is backing a bill that would require judges to be frank about juries' power to nullify the law.

"The bill would force judges to tell the truth to juries. We already have the authority in the law," he said.

So far, the association has not found anyone in the Missouri or Illinois legislatures to introduce its legislation. The bill has passed one chamber in some legislatures, but as of yet, not both.

Although Missouri has no such legislation, Gov. Mel Carnahan signed a proclamation observing Jury Rights Day on Sept. 5. To the faithful of the Fully Informed Jury Association, Jury Rights Day is synonymous with a celebration of jury nullification.

However, Chris Sifford, Carnahan's spokesman, said the governor only signed the proclamation as an endorsement of the jury system, not of jury nullification.

The proclamation states that under "English and American legal doctrine it is the right and responsibility of the trial jury to decide both on matters of law and fact" and that Missouri "recognizes these rights as true and inalienable."

*****

Roots In The Magna Carta

The jury association takes its legal precedents all the way back to the Magna Carta in 1215, when King John was forced to surrender his power to rule by decree. The association cites statements by John Adams, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, Samuel Chase and Thomas Jefferson.

The group also invokes freedom of the press. John Peter Zenger was acquitted in 1735 when a jury nullified a British law against criticizing the royal governor of New York.

According to the association, judges began overruling the power of juries in 1850 because so many northern juries refused to convict abolitionists charged with helping runaway slaves. In 1895, the Supreme Court - in the case which is still the binding precedent - ruled that judges did not have to inform jurors they had the power to nullify the law. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Point of Law: Juries Entitled to Ignore It the Power of Nullification Puts Activists, Jurists at Odds
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.