Lott Adds Backing to Weapons Treaty

By Ap | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), April 25, 1997 | Go to article overview

Lott Adds Backing to Weapons Treaty


Ap, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


A treaty to ban chemical weapons gained strength in the Senate Thursday when Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., swung behind the pact, and supporters easily prevailed on early test votes.

With a final roll call set for later Thursday, Lott cited a string of changes agreed to by the White House in recent weeks - including last-minute written assurances from President Bill Clinton - for his decision to back the treaty.

On the pact, Lott said, "I believe the U.S. is marginally better off with it than without it. . . . It is a close call." He announced his position moments after treaty supporters voted 71-29 to eliminate a provision that would have barred U.S. ratification until Iran, Iraq, Syria and other so-called rogue states acceded to the pact. The White House had labeled the provision a "killer amendment." Sens. Dick Durbin and Carol Moseley-Braun, both D-Ill., and Christopher S. Bond, R-Mo., voted to delete this provision; Sen. John Ashcroft, R-Mo., voted to keep it. A second provision, deferring approval until Russia ratified the treaty, was likewise removed, on a vote of 66-34. A third provision requiring Clinton to bar inspectors from certain unfriendly nations, was defeated, 56-44. Vice President Al Gore presided over the Senate for that vote, in case he was needed to break a tie. Lott predicted that the treaty itself would win with 72 to 78 votes. A two-thirds majority - 67 - of the 100 senators is required for ratification. The treaty would ban the use, development, production or stockpiling of all chemical warfare agents and require the destruction of existing stockpiles over the next decade. Can't Be Verified? It has been signed by 164 nations thus far, and ratified by 75. With or without U.S. ratification, the pact will take effect on April 29. Opponents, led by Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C., argue that the treaty cannot be verified and would open the United States to danger from nations such as Libya, North Korea and Iraq that refuse to sign the agreement. Helms said, "The truth of the matter is it won't do a thing in the world to help the situation. It's not a comprehensive ban." But supporters argued that the United States was already in the process of destroying its own stockpiles of poison gas and said the only way to isolate renegade nations was through U.S. participation in the treaty. "The best way to affect the behavior of these states is to bring to bear the sanctions, isolate and target those states," said Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del. Lott's decision appeared to seal the verdict on the Senate floor, and, in a reference to opposition to the treaty from conservatives, he admitted , "I'm going to take a lot of flak for it." Lott began the debate Thursday by releasing a letter from Clinton in which the president said he was "prepared to withdraw from the treaty" if other countries used it to transfer materials that could be used to develop chemical weapons or if it undermined a 30-nation pact that imposes export controls and other measures against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Lott Adds Backing to Weapons Treaty
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.