Chemical Treaty Had Political Costs in Exchange for Ratification, Concessions May Come out of Budget

By Ap | St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO), April 27, 1997 | Go to article overview

Chemical Treaty Had Political Costs in Exchange for Ratification, Concessions May Come out of Budget


Ap, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)


President Bill Clinton went all-out to win Senate ratification of the chemical weapons treaty, and now the costs of his concessions could begin showing up in other areas - like the budget.

Clinton's effort followed a historical pattern in which presidents, especially those in second terms, expend enormous amounts of political capital to win treaty fights.

"It's one of the things that gets you into the history books," said Fred Greenstein, a political scientist at Princeton University. The Senate's ratification of the treaty to ban the production of chemical and biological weapons was an important and hard-fought victory for Clinton. But, in exchange for enhancing his prestige on the world stage, Clinton may find that he has relinquished some of his options for dealing with the GOP-led Congress. Mounting a major lobbying campaign, Clinton sent teams of Cabinet members to Capitol Hill, made direct appeals to wavering senators, showcased former President George Bush's support for the treaty and won the support of 1996 GOP rival Bob Dole and of Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss. "He was on the phone with individual senators," said Lott, whose final-day support for the treaty helped push it over the top. "I wish he'd get on the phone each day and work with individual senators on the budget." Lott's words signaled that he now expects budget concessions from Clinton. A Bill To Be Paid "It's going to cost him something," said Steven Wayne, a political scientist at Georgetown University. "You don't get anything for free. The support of Dole and Lott will come at some cost, probably in the budget negotiations." Even though Lott has denied any direct linkage, he told reporters Friday, "I hope he (Clinton) will make some really bold move on the budget." Pressure is now on Clinton to move more in the direction of tax cuts favored by Republicans. At a news conference Friday, Clinton called the treaty vote "an indication of what we can do" when working together in the national interest, and said he hoped a similar agreement could be reached on a balanced budget plan. Apart from how the treaty debate might affect the budget talks, a dministration allies also are concerned that Senate conservatives who voted for the treaty may try to make amends with the right by opposing the president's renewal of trade benefits for China. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Chemical Treaty Had Political Costs in Exchange for Ratification, Concessions May Come out of Budget
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.