S. Africa Drops Pillar of Apartheid but the Government May Have to Use Economic Pressure to Force Local Councils to Accept Reform
John Battersby, writer of The Christian Science Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor
ANXIOUS whites in this conservative mining town have tried in the past to defy the ruling National Party's efforts to dismantle apartheid. But they were thwarted by a combination of black protest and government pressure.
So when the segregation of public facilities becomes illegal today, protest from right-wing councilmen is likely to be muted.
"We will have to wait and see what happens," said council chairman Dawid de Ridder, a member of the Conservative Party. "We have not taken any special precautions, but if we are overwhelmed, we'll have to do something."
Mr. De Ridder was referring to the resistance mounted by his counterparts in dozens of conservative towns nationwide to block the repeal of one of apartheid's cornerstones.
Although the repeal of the law won't end all statutory discrimination, it marks a milestone in dismantling structures that have made the country an international pariah.
The Reservation of Separate Amenities Act was enacted by a defiant National Party government in 1953. To many blacks, the law - which has enabled councils to segregate public transportation, libraries, swimming pools, rest rooms, elevators, and resorts - symbolizes the most visible and offensive aspects of apartheid. The act was the basis for the erection of "whites only" signs at public facilities throughout the country during the 1950s and 60s.
The law offered legal protection for racist views that were fostered among whites during four decades of National Party rule.
Segregation will continue in residential neighborhoods, state-run schools, and the allocation of land. But President Frederik de Klerk has promised that these laws will be repealed next year.
In the past decade or so, the National Party government has condoned the gradual relaxation of segregation in the major cities and towns, and most "whites only" signs have disappeared. But - until today - the Separate Amenities Act remained a potent tool for right-wing city councils seeking to halt the relaxation of race policies.
Shortly after Mr. De Klerk was installed last year, he indicated that the law would be eliminated. In the first quarter of this year, councils of major cities and towns desegregated their facilities in preparation for its repeal.
But scores of Conservative Party-controlled councils in rural, mining, and industrial towns began to revert toward more rigid segregation.
Though the Separate Amenities Act was repealed by Parliament in June, its enactment was delayed until Oct. 15 to allow the councils to prepare for the changes. Rather than accept desegregated facilities, many town councils - controlled by both the Conservative and National parties - have opted for a system of differentiated tariffs for entrance to public swimming pools, libraries, and recreation areas. …