Labor Party Wins Surprise Fifth Term in Australian Vote
Catherine Foster, writer of The Christian Science Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor
IN a victory that stunned the media, political analysts, and members of both parties, Prime Minister Paul Keating swept past Liberal-National Coalition leader John Hewson Saturday to win an unprecedented fifth term for a Labor government. Labor took 76 seats to the Coalition's 62.
Although polls last week had Mr. Keating pulling slightly ahead, Dr. Hewson was still favored to win.
It was described as an "unloseable election" for the opposition. Three days before the election, the worst unemployment figures in Australia's history were released. Labor's decade in power had seen the country sink into the worst recession since the Great Depression. Hewson's rally, "Labor's got to go," was gaining momentum.
What Hewson offered was a vision of an Australian economy based on free-market principles and reduced government. A year ago, he put forth a radical economic reform package, called "Fightback!," that was supposed to make Australia internationally competitive and get the economy rolling again. But the package was vast and complicated and the 15 percent goods-and-services tax (GST) that was its centerpiece aroused much controversy.
The win is being attributed to Keating's shrewd political instincts. He revealed little of his own plans, but clamped on, crocodile-like, to the GST and would not let go. Despite his own approval of a GST as Labor Party treasurer in 1985, he has since turned against it and said frequently in campaign speeches that people would pay 15 percent more on everything from toothpaste to theater tickets.
Hewson argued that Keating was using fear tactics and misrepresenting the impact of GST. But the former economist was not able to explain the effect of the GST on people's lives.
Aside from the GST, people were concerned about unspecified changes in the Medicare system. They feared that proposed changes in labor's relationship to industry might be too radical.
Some analysts say it was a morally brave but politically foolhardy move to lay out such a challenging package so far in advance. …