Top British MPs Call London Broadsheets Slim on Substance Minister's Fedora Fetish Replaces Serious Newspaper Analysis, Say Lawmakers
Alexander MacLeod, Monitor, The Christian Science Monitor
Former American Vice President Spiro Agnew once derided reporters as "nattering nabobs of negativism." Polls regularly bemoan the media's lack of objectivity. Indeed, a favorite pastime of people the world over, it seems, is slamming the press.
But Britain's Parliament has gone a step further. Led by senior members of Parliament, the House of Commons set forth a resolution last month criticizing London's most prestigious newspapers. It said serious reporting and analysis of politics in their pages are in "steep decline."
The attack on such entrenched broadsheets as The Times, The Daily Telegraph, and The Guardian asserted that the papers are focusing on "personalities rather than policies, and trivia rather than substance."
The Times has hit back, arguing that its coverage of House of Commons affairs is less than it used to be because "authority has seeped elsewhere" - a point generally conceded by many observers. Furthermore, government announcements, said the paper once known as "the Thunderer," now often take the form of statements made by politicians on radio or TV "rather than in long speeches in Parliament."
But the politicians were undeterred. Leading the attack on Britain's so-called "quality press" is Tim Renton, a former Conservative chief whip, who has the backing of several former senior cabinet ministers.
Mr. Renton has accused editors of failing to provide the public with serious coverage of important issues. He says The Times editorial rejecting his complaints showed that "our dart has hit a bull's-eye."
Using the crisis over British beef as an example of "trivialization," Renton says it is easier to write, "Is Douglas Hogg, the agriculture minister, going to get the chop?" than to talk about the reasons why the crisis occurred in the first place.
Renton adds: "We want to put over the heartfelt message that we think the serious stuff is being crowded out in the rush for circulation."
Indeed, overcrowding of the market could explain a shift in coverage. Currently 11 nationally circulating daily newspapers are available to British readers.
And this already intense competition is further exaggerated at the "respectable" end of the market, where four papers are in a savage battle for subscribers: The Times, The Independent, The Daily Telegraph, and The Guardian.
This competition can send papers searching for the most sensationally scintillating stories.
For instance, along with other British newspapers, during the beef crisis the Times made great play with Douglas Hogg's sour countenance and preference for fedora hats on his visits to Brussels. …