Climate Change: Why It Could Be a Hot Topic on the Campaign Trail
Clayton, Mark, The Christian Science Monitor
Like Lord Voldemort in the Harry Potter saga, climate change has been the issue "that shall not be named" mostly a political no- show in the presidential campaign.
But that may be changing thanks to the political heat generated by the two conventions.
In Tampa, Mitt Romney threw down the gauntlet to Barack Obama, for whom global warming and the consequent sea level rise has been a signature issue since he promised in 2008 to do something about it as president.
"President Obama promised to begin to slow the rise of the oceans and heal the planet," Mr. Romney told GOP delegates in Tampa, a smile on his face. "My promise [long pause audience laughter] is to help you and your family."
But that laugh line appears to have been just too much for Mr. Obama, who is fighting for support in a neck-and-neck campaign where the economy not climate change is the front and center issue. So he let fly.
"Yes, my plan will continue to reduce the carbon pollution that is heating our planet because climate change is not a hoax," the president shouted to delegates in Charlotte, N.C. "More droughts and floods and wildfires are not a joke. They're a threat to our children's future. And in this election, you can do something about it."
That high-profile statement, political analysts say, may have marked a major turnabout for the president, who has scarcely mentioned global warming or the more scientific designation of "climate change" in recent months.
Ever since an attempt to pass cap-and-trade legislation to limit greenhouse gas emissions failed in 2010, the president has seemed almost mute on the topic with a few rare exceptions mostly when speaking overseas, frustrated environmentalists say.
"Two years ago the White House communications shop decided this was not a good issue to talk about," says Joe Romm, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund and a former acting assistant secretary of energy. His blog, called "Climate Progress," has tracked the issue closely.
"My guess is that Obama, who is an incredibly competitive guy, was just annoyed at mockery and laughter and wanted to respond personally," Mr. Romm says. "But I also think that he's been trying to think about how to inject climate into the debate. Romney gave him an opening to do just that."
But there are also indications that Obama, scratching for support among independent voters in Ohio, Iowa, and other swing states, may have been warming to the idea of once again more publicly embracing climate change.
"It's been easy for the other side to pour millions of dollars into a campaign to debunk climate-change science," Obama told Rolling Stone magazine in April. "I suspect that over the next six months, [climate change] is going to be a debate that will become part of the campaign, and I will be very clear in voicing my belief that were going to have to take further steps to deal with climate change in a serious way."
Be that as it may, Obama and his campaign would be unlikely to be so undisciplined as to get into a national high-profile fight over climate policy if he were going to lose credibility with a public more hungry for jobs than fixing global warming.
But what if climate change turned out to be a good issue not a boat anchor? …