National Parties Abandon Some Incumbents
Freking, Kevin, St Louis Post-Dispatch (MO)
GAITHERSBURG, Md. - Thanks for your service, and good luck.
That's what the national parties are saying to congressional veterans such as Roscoe Bartlett, the Maryland Republican whose district was redrawn by Democrats to include liberal-leaning communities near the capital Beltway. National Republicans have all but abandoned his bid for an 11th House term. Bartlett, 86, is not giving up. He says he's the most environmentally conscious Republican in Congress.
"That's not a very steep hill to climb," Bartlett said in a recent interview, acknowledging his party's record on environmental issues. "But I'm the greenest Republican, so I have a lot of characteristics that recommend me to these people."
Both parties have officeholders they've effectively thrown overboard, but not as many as in 2010.
Republican and Democratic strategists point to three House campaigns where the parties clearly have declined to make independent expenditures for an incumbent in trouble - Bartlett, fellow Republican David Rivera in Florida and Democrat Larry Kissell in North Carolina.
National Republican officials who control millions of party dollars also have abandoned GOP Senate candidate Todd Akin, an 11- year House veteran thought to have a decent shot at unseating Missouri Democrat Claire McCaskill until his remarks in August about "legitimate rape."
In a few other cases, the distance between party leaders and the candidate is less clear but perceptible, as the party committees scale back their spending in some districts or decline to match the resources that the other party is throwing into the race. It's a phenomenon that happens to some degree in every election, but this year it's been driven in part by once-a-decade redistricting and the occasional political scandal.
Because incumbents are generally the last group of candidates the national campaign committees abandon, being a member of this tiny caucus of the rejected carries particular sting. Democrats need to gain 25 seats to retake the House majority, an uphill battle they're not expected to win. Republicans say that is why Democrats are dumping so few incumbents.
"The sign that there's not going to be big swings is that Democrats are defending their own," said Paul Lindsay, spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee. "For every one of those losses, they have to find a win somewhere else. And the map is not big enough for them."
Democratic officials scoffed, pointing to the Republicans' shifting support away from Tea Party candidates such as Bartlett and New Hampshire freshman Rep. Frank Guinta, who is facing a difficult rematch against Democrat Carol Shea-Porter. Two years ago, Shea- Porter was one of the incumbents that Democrats threw overboard. Republicans have supported Guinta this year, but not in the last two weeks, federal fundraising records show.
"Republicans have a funny way of showing they're protecting the Tea Party majority when they're giving up on their own members," said Jesse Ferguson, spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Officials at the NRCC noted that total spending when all outside groups are included favors the Republican candidate, giving the NRCC flexibility to put resources elsewhere. …