Could Capital Gains Tax Increase Federal Revenues?

By Passell, Peter | THE JOURNAL RECORD, June 28, 1988 | Go to article overview

Could Capital Gains Tax Increase Federal Revenues?


Passell, Peter, THE JOURNAL RECORD


Few among Washington's movers and shakers spend their leisure hours contemplating the intricacies of multilinear regression analysis. But many do appreciate the value of arcane economic research that delivers an easily understood political message.

That's why the Treasury Department's research paper No. 8801, ``The Direct Revenue Effects of Capital Gains Taxation,'' made headlines earlier this month. By offering evidence that a halving of the tax rate would increase federal revenue, the authors breathed new life into George Bush's best known campaign proposal. What true blue American could oppose a tax cut that cost the government nothing?

These results are not destined to be the last words on the subject. Neither supply-side enthusiasts from the Treasury's economics division nor anyone else actually knows whether the volume of realized capital gains would rise sufficiently to offset the effect of a much lower tax rate. And even if the supply-siders are right, total tax revenues could fall as investors finagled to convert ordinary dividend income into lesser taxed capital gains.

One way to break what now appears to be a political as well as intellectual deadlock would be to pair the capital gains proposal with another change in the tax code that offsets any conceivable revenue loss. An obvious candidate: elimination of the provision that allows individuals to pass on appreciated property to their heirs without paying any tax on the capital gain.

Economists including Martin S. Feldstein, a former adviser to President Reagan, and Joseph Minarik, a principal designer of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, have been quarreling over the likely revenue effect of a reduction in capital gains tax rates for nearly a decade. But the debate seemed to take a decisive turn politically last March when the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that a cut in the current 33 percent maximum rate to 15 percent would cost the Treasury $4 billion to $7 billion annually.

With the Federal deficit pushing $165 billion, few members of Congress are eager to vote for any budget-busting tax measure, much less one whose direct benefits would go mostly to people with incomes above $100,000.

Hence the significance of the new report, prepared by a group under Michael Darby, assistant Treasury secretary for economic policy. Darby grafted simulation techniques used in a 1985 study by the Treasury's tax analysis division to the basic statistical model of taxpayer behavior estimated by the budget office. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Could Capital Gains Tax Increase Federal Revenues?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.