Uninformed Electorate Refuses to Vote for Judges

By Knapschaefer, Johanna | THE JOURNAL RECORD, November 19, 1988 | Go to article overview

Uninformed Electorate Refuses to Vote for Judges


Knapschaefer, Johanna, THE JOURNAL RECORD


Many judicial retention ballots landed in the trash can rather than the ballot box in Pottawatomie County.

This is just one sign of voter frustration among voters who knew little or nothing about the eight appellate court judges who won approval in the Nov. 8 election, said secretaries of local election boards.

Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Marian Opala, who passed the voters test to serve another six years, said he suspected a "large majority of voters for the retention ballot were totally uniformed."

"Getting information to the voters is a real problem in all judicial elections," said Kate Sampson, spokeswoman for the American Judicature Society in Chicago, an independent, non-profit organization which works to improve the courts.

In 1934, California took the lead in adopting retention elections as part of its gubernatorial selection of appellate court judges, followed by Missouri in 1940, which adopted it as part of its merit selection process, which uses a judical committee to appoint judges.

Retention elections were first created as a non-partisan way to combine the system of electing judges by popular vote, such as in Illinois, and the appointive system, such as in Oklahoma, where a committee appoints judges.

"Retention elections were first intended to make it hard to remove qualified judges and to protect their independence by insulating them from the whims of voters who might react to a particular decision," Sampson said. By using retention elections, states sought to give voters the opportunity to periodically evaluate a judge while preserving separation between the judicial branch and the legislature.

At present, voters in 16 states, including Oklahoma, re-elect appellate judges with retention ballots. All but three of those states use the merit selection system where a judicial nominating commmittee selects the judges.

Oklahoma first adopted the retention ballot for re-electing Supreme Court and Court of Appeals judges in 1967 when the constitution was amended to create a merit selection system for choosing judges which came in response to the 1964 Supreme Court scandal, said Marvin Emerson, director of the 12,000-member Oklahoma Bar Association. In the scandal, Oklahoma Supreme Court Justices Earl Welch and N.S. Corn were convicted for income tax evasion. Both were implicated with Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice N.B. Johnson who was impeached after being convicted of federal bribery charges.

To create an effective system, 21 state and 77 local bar associations presently conduct bar polls to educate their voters on judicial candidates prior to an election. About 12 percent provide data to judicial commissions, according to a 1982 bar poll survey conducted by Professor Kenyon Griffin of the University of Wyoming.

Despite voter unawareness of judicial candidates, the Oklahoma Bar Association, a mandatory non-profit association, has chosen not to conduct bar polls.

"There has been discussion about judicial evaluation polls, but we could legally jeopardize our tax exempt status by conducting a political campaign by bar polling," Emerson said.

When asked who should educate the voters, he replied, "the power of the press."

The State Bar of Arizona, also a non-profit mandatory bar, has avoided participation in political activity by sponsoring pre-election bar polls through Arizona State University Survey Research Laboratory in Tempe, Arizona. "We have had tremendous response this year," said Jenny Fink, public relations coordinator for the State Bar of Arizona.

"Last week we received 20 phone calls a day from voters requesting information on judicial candidates. The poll is really the only concrete way for voters to make informed decisions about judges."

The Lab, which began polling for the state bar in 1976, conducts a survey of one fourth or 2,600 of its 10,400 members who are instructed to rate trial judges before whom they have practiced or higher judges whose decisions they know first-hand. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Uninformed Electorate Refuses to Vote for Judges
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.