Bush Vetoes Civil Rights Bil; Claims It Could Harm Firms

THE JOURNAL RECORD, October 23, 1990 | Go to article overview

Bush Vetoes Civil Rights Bil; Claims It Could Harm Firms


GD99;AGB;IP1,1.6;MC4;ITS;PS66,102;XP;END;

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush vetoed a major civil rights bill Monday and seemed assured of winning a battle in Congress to override him.

``I deeply regret having to take this action,'' Bush said.

The president called on lawmakers to enact his version of the measure before they quit for the yea, probably later this week. However, that appeared unlikely, as Bush's critics scoffed at his proposal.

The administration argued that the bill, as passed by Congress, would force businesses to adopt quotas in hiring and promotion. Supporters of the measure rejected the White House argument and portrayed Bush's stand as a measure of his commitment on human rights.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., the chief Senate sponsor, called the veto ``tragic and disgraceful.''

``When the chips are down, the White House is against civil rights,'' Kennedy said. He urged Congress to override the president.

Ralph G. Neas, executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, said Bush's veto ``will victimize his presidency forever. He joins Andrew Johnson and Ronald Reagan as the only presidents to veto a civil rights bill.''

The bill was passed by the Senate 62-34 and by the House 273-154 - strong majorities, but not reaching the two-thirds required to override a veto.

Rep. Augustus F. Hawkins, D-Calif., the prime House sponsor, said he would not even ask for an override vote without the two-thirds needed by supporters. ``I'm just not going to waste any more time,'' Hawkins said, adding that civil rights forces might even lose support in an override fight.

In his veto message, Bush said, ``The temptation to support a bill - any bill - simply because its title includes the words `civil rights' is very strong.

``But when our efforts, however well-intentioned, result in quotas, equal opportunity is not advanced but thwarted,'' he said. ``The very commitment to justice and equality that is offered as the reason why this bill should be signed requires me to veto it.''

He said, ``I deeply regret having to take this action with a bill bearing such a title, especially since it contains certain provisions that I strongly endorse.''

The measure would nullify six Supreme Court decisions that have made it more difficult for women and minorities to prove and win job discrimination suits. It would ban racial harassment in the workplace and allow punitive damages in the most serious discrimination cases.

Bush said there were many similarities between the bill he vetoed and the version that the administration supports, offered at the last minute to ease the veto.

Civil rights advocates denounced the latest version of Bush's bill as a sham for permitting challenged hiring practices to stand if they could be justified on such grounds as ``customer relations,'' justifications they said were used to support the separate-but-equal ``Jim Crow'' laws of the first half of the 20th century that kept blacks in segregation.

Rep. Don Edwards, D-Calif., chairman of the House Judiciary subcommittee on civil and constitutional rights, called Bush's bill ``a tired rehash of policies considered and rejected by the Congress. ... We have nearly compromised this bill to death.''

Summing up his key argument, Bush said, ``Despite the use of the term `civil rights' in the title ... the bill actually employs a maze of highly legalistic language to introduce the destructive force of quotas into our nation's employment system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Bush Vetoes Civil Rights Bil; Claims It Could Harm Firms
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.