Strategic Planning as We Knew You, R.I.P

By Peters, Tom | THE JOURNAL RECORD, April 7, 1994 | Go to article overview

Strategic Planning as We Knew You, R.I.P


Peters, Tom, THE JOURNAL RECORD


McGill University Professor Henry Mintzberg, perhaps the world's premier management thinker, hammered the last nails in strategic planning's coffin in his just-released book, "The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning."

Of course, our mindless love affair with planning effectively ended a dozen years ago, when then-neophyte GE Chairman Jack Welch nixed his corporation's hyper-formalized planning system and most of the planners along with it. Still, Mintzberg's latest is so encyclopedic, so damning . . . and so final. It closes a major act in the American management drama.

"A good deal of corporate planning . . . is like a ritual rain dance," wrote Dartmouth Professor Brian Quinn. "It has no effect on the weather that follows, but those who engage in it think it does."

Mintzberg hardly limits himself to reciting such gratuitous, if deadly accurate, barbs. In chapter after chapter he meticulously exposes planning's problems. Consider just three: Process strangles. Process was king for the champions of strategic planning. They are "more set on deciding rightly than upon right decisions," said one commentator. In the late 1970s, Mariann Jelinek gushed about Texas Instruments' rococo Objectives, Tactics and Strategies system, a scheme one TI exec later described as "a paperwork mill that makes it absolutely impossible to respond to anything that moves quickly." (TI, like GE, trashed its system following a long string of marketplace blunders.)

Mintzberg views Jelinek's belief in "institutionalizing innovation" as the final performance of a long-running play. "The revolution that (time-and-motion study pioneer Frederick) Taylor initiated in the factory," he wrote, "was (now) being repeated at the apex of the hierarchy, and the outcome would be fundamentally no different." Hard data ain't. Not surprisingly, process fanatics go gaga over factoids. Yet Mintzberg reveals the "soft underbelly of hard data," typified by the fallacy of "measuring what's measurable." The results are limiting, for example a pronounced tendency "to favor `cost leadership' strategies (emphasizing operating efficiencies, which are generally measurable) over product-leadership strategies (emphasizing innovative design or high quality, which tends to be less measurable)."

Overall, Mintzberg opined, "While hard data may inform the intellect, it is largely soft data that generate wisdom. They may be difficult to `analyze,' but they are indispensable for `synthesis' _ the key to strategy making." Detachment kills. Mintzberg next pounces on the "assumption of detachment," quantification's close kin. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Strategic Planning as We Knew You, R.I.P
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.