Federal Judge Rejects Microsoft Settlement

THE JOURNAL RECORD, February 15, 1995 | Go to article overview

Federal Judge Rejects Microsoft Settlement


WASHINGTON (AP) _ A federal judge rejected the Justice Department's proposed antitrust settlement with Microsoft Corp., saying it fails to break the software giant's monopoly or correct its "anticompetitive practices."

In a 45-page ruling issued late Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Stanley Sporkin said he was unable to find _ as required by law _ that the proposed settlement was in the public interest.

"Microsoft has a monopoly on the market for personal computer operating systems," Sporkin declared, noting that company's share of the market is consistently above 70 percent.

The proposed decree, he said, applies only to future licensing practices by Microsoft. The government, he added, failed to show how that would "remedy the unfair advantage Microsoft gained through its anticompetitive practices."

"Simply telling a defendant to go forth and sin no more does little or nothing to address the unfair advantage it has already gained," Sporkin wrote. "The decree is too little, too late."

Microsoft spokesman Mich Mathews said the company needed time to read Sporkin's opinion before deciding its next step.

"We are disappointed," Mathews said.

Justice spokeswoman Gina Talamona said antitrust division attorneys were reviewing the ruling. They declined further comment. "I'm going to read the opinion," said Attorney General Janet Reno.

Sporkin's rejection of the proposed settlement leaves the government with several options: It could appeal his ruling; it could go to trial on its allegations against Microsoft, or it could try to negotiate a new agreement with the company that would satisfy Sporkin.

Microsoft's stock fell 12 cents 61.87 Tuesday in NASDAQ trading, which was over before the ruling was announced.

Sporkin's refusal to approve the decree was highly unusual. But he has grumbled publicly for several months about the narrowness of the government's case.

The proposed settlement, which was reached last July 15, would have forced Microsoft to change the way it sells or licenses operating software to personal computer makers.

The company has enormous influence in the computer industry. Microsoft's MS DOS _ and its Windows program which allows the user to select visual images to issue MS DOS commands _ is the operating software for an overwhelming majority of the world's 150 million computers.

The settlement focused on prohibiting Microsoft from engaging in certain licensing procedures that the government argued gave the company an unfair advantage in selling its computer operating systems and other software to companies that make computer terminals and other hardware.

The agreement was reached after four years of investigation, first by the Federal Trade Commission, which was unable to act, and then by the Justice Department's antitrust division. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Federal Judge Rejects Microsoft Settlement
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.