Discrimination, Arbitration, Violation

By Jones, Leigh | THE JOURNAL RECORD, January 27, 1998 | Go to article overview

Discrimination, Arbitration, Violation


Jones, Leigh, THE JOURNAL RECORD


With about 200 discrimination lawsuits filed just last year against employers in Oklahoma's Western District, mandatory arbitration looks like the solution to jammed dockets.

But opponents argue it's a violation of constitutional rights and an affront to public policy in the name of expediency.

Since the Gilmer decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1991, employers have received the green light in binding employees to seek redress for discrimination through arbitration, instead of filing lawsuits in court. Those agreements generally cover all disputes against employers, the most common being wage issues and allegations of discrimination -- whether they are gender, race, age, religion or disability. Though courts typically enforce such agreements, a growing movement of professional organizations are denouncing them as undermining employees' rights. "There's a wide consensus that it's unfair to the public, but the courts keep going the other way," says Professor Sarah Cole with the University of Oklahoma College of Law. Indeed, the National Association of Securities Dealers voted in August to eliminate its policy of mandatory arbitration. Now, brokers may choose to sign a mandatory arbitration agreement or reserve the right to file a federal lawsuit when a dispute arises. Too, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the American Bar Association and the American Arbitration Association have all refused to support such agreements, though they still endorse alternative dispute resolution as a viable option. The constitutional issues arising in some mandatory arbitration agreements, says employment lawyer Valerie K. Couch, relate to due process. "What gives many people pause is the consequence of taking courts out of the civil rights process." For example, discovery in arbitration is generally more limited, usually to what the parties themselves decide or to guidelines established by the arbitrating organization. Moreover, the arbitrator is frequently hired by the employer, prompting some employees to cry foul. In addition, arbitration decisions are not based on court precedent and generally are not appealable. "Arbitration is sometimes, well, arbitrary," says Annita Bridges, president of Litigation Alternatives. Cole asserts the larger issue is a public policy one. When discrimination issues are relegated to the private dispute arena, she says society loses the benefit of policy-shaping conflicts resolved as a matter of public record. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Discrimination, Arbitration, Violation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.